pf_03280 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

e. City records indicate that the right-of-way for Heinel Circle was dedicated wi!h the original Oak Point plat in 1949, but do not indicate why the existing home infringes 15 feet within the required front yard setback. With the additional eight foot requested encroachment into the required setback the proposed garage will set within seven feet of the street right-of-way line. The distance from the proposed addition to the st:eet curb will be approximately 37 feet and will be visually consistent with 695 Heinel Circle. Within this 37 feet a vehicle can be completely parked off of the street pavement. There appears to be no adverse impacts to the surrounding properties. f The curb line of the cul-de-sac is situated approximately 30 feet from the property line, thus allowil1g ample area between the new garage addition and street curb line to park a vehicle, which does not create any significant impacts on the minimally (mosCy adjacent residents and mail delivery) traveled Heinel Circle. g. The impacts of this redevelopment project, if the variances were issued, will not create any significant community impacts on the health, safety, or general welfare. 6.G PILANNRNG COMMRSSION CONSR]j))EJRA 11'RON 6.1 On January 10, 2001, the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the Vesterholt request. At the meeting no adjacent residents were present to speak on the subject. Mr. Vesterholt explained the expansion and benefit of removing the front storage shed and was available to answer questions from the Planning Commission. 6.2 The Planning Com."1lission voted (5-0) to recommend approval of the Vesterholt request for multiple variances necessary to construct a garage addition at 699 Heinel Circle, based on the findings in Section 5 (see attached resolution) and subject to the following conditions: A. The parcel shall be limited to a maximum impervious area of 4,784 square feet or 25% of the parcel size and the garage addition shall be limited to 527 square feet as depicted on the proposed survey of 10/17/00 and the proposed floor plan of 11/27/00. B. The proposed principal garage addition shall be set back a minimum of five fe~t from the northeast (side) property line and set back a minimum of seven and one half feet from the southeast (front) property line. C. All roof drainage created by the addition and existing attached garage must be collected in gutters ar:d channeled to the natural drainage way within the applicant's pro:?erty (northeast). D. Because of the size of the variances being granted, no other accessory building or tool shed may be permitted on the property. E. The property owner shall provide the City with a landscape plan that addresses the interests of the Department of Natural Resources. PF3280 - RCA (012201) Page 4 of 5 -~, _.-...,_, _.011. .__,...,......... ._-~