Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />DATE: 01110101 <br />ITEM NO: 6e <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />A request by Peter Vesterholt, 699 Heinel Circle, for a 5 and 23 foot variance <br />from Section 1004.02D (Minimum Yard Requirements), 1016.22Al (Non- <br />Conformities), and 1016.16 (Structure Design Standards) of the Roseville <br />Zoning Ordinance to allow construction of an attached garage into the required <br />side and front yard (street side) setback (PF3280). <br /> <br />Manager Approved: <br /> <br /> <br />1.0 REQUESTED ACTION <br /> <br />1.1 Peter Vesterholt, property owner of 699 Heinel Circle, has requested variances from Section <br />1004.02D5, 1016.16, and lOl6.22Al of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction a <br />527 square foot garage addition. The proposed garage addition would encroach into the <br />required 10-foot side yard setback (5 feet) and the required 30-foot front yard setback (23 feet). <br /> <br />2.0 REVIEW of REQUEST <br /> <br />2.1 Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard <br />and Lot Area Requirements in R-l Districts) requires a front yard setback of 30 feet for <br />the Vesterholt property adjacent to Heinel Circle. Mr. Vesterholt wants to eliminate an <br />existing (unsightly) shed and construct an addition onto his existing garage to improve <br />handicapped accessibility for his wife. The existing garage, 19 feet wide by 21 feet deep (399 <br />square feet) lies approximately 15 feet from the front yard (east) property line. The proposal <br />would place the garage approximately 7 feet from the front property line. This front yard <br />setback variance also requires a variance from Section 602 allowing vehicles to be parked <br />within street right-of-way. <br /> <br />2.2 Section 1004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard <br />and Lot Area Requirements in R-l Districts) also requires a side yard setback of 10 feet <br />for the Vesterholt property along the northeast property line. Mr. Vesterholt proposes to <br />extend the garage towards the northeastern side yard property line to create an additional stall <br />and enclosed storage area. The design and additional area will offer accessibility to stored <br />items and greater movement around vehicles. However, the proposed addition would encroach <br />five feet into the required 10- foot side yard setback. <br /> <br />2.3 Section 1016.22Al (Non-Conformities) stipulates that non-conformities can continue but <br />are subject to applicable State Statutes and City Ordinance regarding alterations, repair <br />after damage, discontinuance of use, and intensification of use. The Vesterholt house has <br />been determined to be a pre-existing non-conforming structure that was constructed prior to the <br />City adopting Shoreland, Wetland, and Storm Water Management regulations. The specific <br />non-conformity is the distance the principal structure is setback (56 feet) from the Ordinary <br />High Watermark. A variance is necessary to bring the house into conformity with the City <br />Code, which requires a 75-foot setback from the OHW. <br /> <br />PF3280 - RPCA (011001) Page 1 of 4 <br />