Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3404255 <br /> <br />3. The new construction (garage addition) provide added livability, accessibility and <br />space for maneuvering vehicles, and the provision of accessible storage for Ms. <br />Vesterholt who has a disability. <br /> <br />4. The addition, though within the required ten-foot side yard setback, is consistent at <br />five feet with the other lots within the cul-de-sac and neighborhood. <br /> <br />5. City records indicate that the right-of-way for Heinel Circle was dedicated with the <br />original Oak Point plat in 1949, but do not indicate why the existing home infringes <br />15 feet within the required front yard setback. With the additional eight foot <br />requested encroachment into the required setback the proposed garage will set within <br />seven feet of the street right-of-way line. The distance from the proposed addition to <br />the street curb will be approximately 37 feet and will be visually consistent with 695 <br />Heinel Circle. Within this 37 feet a vehicle can be completely parked off of the street <br />pavement. There appears to be no adverse impacts to the surrounding properties. <br /> <br />6. The curb line of the cul-de-sac is situated approximately 30 feet from the property <br />line, thus allowing ample area between the new garage addition and street curb line to <br />park a vehicle, which does not create any significant impacts on the minimally <br />(mostly adjacent residents and mail delivery) traveled Heinel Circle. <br /> <br />7. The impacts of this redevelopment project, if the variances were issued, will not <br />create any significant community impacts on the health, safety, or general welfare. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council received the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation on Monday, January 22,2001; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. Section 10116.22A1 (Non-Conformities) stipulates that non-conformities can <br />continue but are subject to applicable State Statutes and City Ordinance regarding <br />alterations, repair after damage, discontinuance of use, and intensification of use. <br /> <br />2. Section 1016.16 (Structure Design Standards) requires structures to be set back a <br />minimum of 75 feet from the ordinary high watermark (OHW). <br /> <br />3. Section 1004. 02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, <br />Yard and Lot Area Requirements in R-1 Districts) requires a front yard setback of 30 <br />feet and side yard setbacks of 1 0 feet. <br /> <br />4. Section 602.06 (Parking of Boulevard Prohibited) does not allow parking of vehicles <br />in the street right-of-way (boulevard. <br /> <br />~ <br />J <br />