Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3404255 <br /> <br />5. The property owner did not create the hardship. The lot division occurred and the <br />structure was constructed and improved many years before the current property <br />owner purchased the property. City records indicate the existing structure was <br />constructed in 1957 with municipal sewer and water being installed in 1964. The <br />Roseville City Code was adopted in 1959 and the Shoreland Ordinance adopted in <br />1974. <br /> <br />6. Like many homes built prior to the Shoreland Ordinance being adopted, the <br />Vesterho/t structure does not comply with the established 75-foot setback from the <br />Ordinary High Watermark. Requiring a setback of 75 feet from the OHW would be <br />unworkable and require removal of existing living area. <br /> <br />7. The new construction (garage addition) can be justified as added livability, <br />accessibility and by providing necessary space for maneuvering vehicles, and <br />provision of accessible storage for Ms. Vesterholt who has a disability. <br /> <br />8. The addition, though within the required ten-foot side yard setback, is consistent at <br />five feet with the other lots within the cul-de-sac and neighborhood. <br /> <br />9. City records indicate that the right-ol-way for Heinel Circle was dedicated with the <br />original Oak Point plat in 1949, but do not indicate why the existing home infringes <br />15 feet within the required front yard setback. With the additional eight foot <br />requested encroachment into the required setback the proposed garage will set within <br />seven feet of the street right-ol-way line. The distance from the proposed addition to <br />the street curb will be approximately 37 feet and will be visually consistent with 695 <br />Heinel Circle. Within this 37 feet a vehicle can be completely parked off of the street <br />pavement. There appears to be no adverse impacts to the surrounding properties. <br /> <br />10. The curb line of the cul-de-sac is situated approximately 30 feet from the property <br />line, thus allowing ample area between the new garage addition and street curb line <br />to park a vehicle, which does not create any significant impacts on the minimally <br />(mostly adjacent residents and mail delivery) traveled Heinel Circle. <br /> <br />11. The impacts of this redevelopment project, if the variances were issued, will not <br />create any significant community impacts on the health, safety, or general welfare. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council, to approve of the <br />variances to Sections l004.02D5 (Dwelling Dimensions and Appearances and Height, Frontage, <br />Yard and Lot Area Requirements in R-I Districts), I016.16A (Structure Design Standards), and <br />1016.22AI (Non-Conformities) ofthe Roseville City Code, regarding the request by Peter <br />Vesterholt, for property at 699 Heinel Circel, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. The parcel shall be limited to a maximum impervious area of 4,784 square feet or <br />25% of the parcel size and the garage addition shall be limited to 527 square feet as <br />depicted on the attached proposed floor plan. <br /> <br />4 <br />