2014_03_05_PC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, March 5, 2014 Page 10 the dorms and back to the residential area. Ms. Cooke opined that sometimes she 461 thought they heard things better at home than within the stadium itself. 462 Regarding the lights, Ms. Cooke recognized that you needed to be able to see in order to 463 play games; however, she expressed concern about the height of the lights. With the 464 location of their property on the other side of the lake and Northwestern higher than those 465 properties, with 80’ light poles, Ms. Cooke opined that it would be putting it so high the 466 residences would be looking at the underside of the lights. On one of the charts, Ms. 467 Cooke noted that it seemed to be a significant number of lights, and even if they were not 468 on all the time, it still sent up a flag for me. Since there are currently no lights, Ms. Cooke 469 stated that it wasn’t a problem, but once installed, they’ll be in use, and therefore, 470 decisions on future use could not be based on current use, since there isn’t any current 471 use. Ms. Cooke opined that, if the lights were installed, it only made sense for them to 472 use them. 473 Ms. Cooke referenced the staff report, and indications that a majority of the trees would 474 remain and be used for screening. However, Ms. Cooke observed that there were no 80’ 475 trees out there; and as shown by the lake, there was a steep slope to the lake, creating a 476 hollow, and those trees wouldn’t do any screening of the lights, as they would below the 477 light source. 478 Mr. Cooke 479 Mr. Cooke questioned if it was possible to light the field with 60’ lights that would be in 480 compliance with City Code. Mr. Cooke opined that it seemed if there were two available 481 options, and one was in compliance with code and one requiring an exception, it seemed 482 prudent to pursue code compliance without exception. Mr. Cooke suggested it may be 483 possible, with the help of lighting engineers, as done at the St. Thomas field. 484 Mr. Paschke clarified that, since the Conditional Use was for lighting ballfields, there were 485 no City Code standards other than conditions placed on it, with the design provided by 486 Musco the lowest limit to get appropriate lighting for existing fields – soccer, football, and 487 baseball – with rationale for providing sufficient lighting, as players wanted daylight-like 488 conditions for playing. Mr. Paschke noted that this request was no different than other 489 schools with ballfields, and that the system incorporated here was state of the art, and 490 different from those at the High School by being directed directly down on the field to 491 mitigate their impact. Mr. Paschke advised that he did not have the light engineering 492 expertise to advise if the college could provide the same lighting with shorter poles. Mr. 493 Paschke advised that he had been told by Musco that this was the most efficient and 494 economical way to light the fields. 495 Member Boguszewski opined that the college representatives seemed to understand that 496 the lighting plan needed to be adhered to; and as a citizen when he looked at a street 497 light, he was personally not aware of the candle strength, or whether it was higher or 498 lower or what difference that might make, since to him it appeared to have the same 499 amount of intensity. Member Boguszewski opined that the school understood their 500 mandate to meet those maximums; and if they did not do so, asked staff the 501 repercussions to them from the City’s enforcement perspective if residents felt the light 502 was exceeding those limits. Member Boguszewski asked how citizens could call the 503 City’s attention to that and what resources were available to ensure the college was in 504 compliance, or in the extreme case, the City needed to withdraw their Conditional Use. 505 Mr. Paschke responded that the City’s action would be to call for another lighting study to 506 make sure they were operating as approved with this improvement; and if they were 507 found to be out of compliance, they would be required to bring it back into compliance. If 508 there remained ongoing problems with the lighting with the intensity and/or spill effect 509 remained a problem, Mr. Paschke advised that the City could look to rescind the use or 510 consider placing more enforceable conditions on the installed lighting system. 511 Member Boguszewski clarified, with Mr. Paschke responding affirmatively, that there was 512 a way at some point for a resident to proceed if they felt the mandates were being 513