My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_03_05_PC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
2014_03_05_PC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2014 11:38:04 AM
Creation date
10/21/2014 11:38:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, March 5, 2014 <br />Page 3 <br />Applicant Representatives <br />96 <br />Associate Vice President for Facilities Brian Humphries and <br />97 <br />Vice President for Athletics and Student Life Matt Hill <br />98 <br />In addressing Chair Gisselquist’s question regarding how often all or a portion of the field <br />99 <br />would be lit, Mr. Hill reviewed next fall’s two scheduled home football games and typically <br />100 <br />five home football games scheduled, but some having noon kick-offs and held on <br />101 <br />Saturday afternoons. Mr. Hill advised that there were approximately seven double- <br />102 <br />headers scheduled for women’s and/or men’s soccer, one of which was an <br />103 <br />afternoon/evening match. Mr. Hill noted that the average number of home football games <br />104 <br />was between 7 to 10, and usually were held on Friday afternoons and Saturday; and <br />105 <br />potentially 5 – 10 soccer matches. Mr. Hill advised that there would also be <br />106 <br />approximately 5 – 10 baseball or softball games, typically scheduled Fridays and <br />107 <br />Saturdays. Mr. Hill noted that tennis matches had yet to be scheduled, and were typically <br />108 <br />dependent on weather conditions, with a preference to start those matches earlier in the <br />109 <br />spring, with most scheduled at 5:00 p.m. start times and lights on as applicable to finish <br />110 <br />matches. Mr. Hill advised that the lights would also be used for other recreational and <br />111 <br />athletic opportunities by community athletic groups using the fields for their activities. <br />112 <br />Member Cunningham expressed her appreciation for the light study. At the request of <br />113 <br />Member Cunningham, Mr. Hill advised that he was not aware of any studies done to <br />114 <br />address noise complaints in his tenure in over the last fifteen years. Mr. Hill advised that <br />115 <br />he had only fielded one complaint call from a neighbor, with that same neighbor having <br />116 <br />filed a similar complaint with the Roseville Police Department. In an effort to address the <br />117 <br />concerns of that neighbor, Mr. Hill advised that they had repositioned some speakers, <br />118 <br />and visited that particular residence to determine volume levels and other issues he’d <br />119 <br />raised in an attempt to address those concerns. However, Mr. Hill admitted that he was <br />120 <br />not sure if staff and the resident would ever be able to come to agreement. <br />121 <br />Regarding the speaker reorientation, Mr. Humphries advised that the speakers now faced <br />122 <br />east toward the internal part of the campus, opining that this should help to mitigate <br />123 <br />sounds to the west. <br />124 <br />Mr. Hill concurred, opining that the campus buildings should serve to mitigate noise on <br />125 <br />the other side as well. <br />126 <br />As a former neighbor who had contacted the college verbally and in writing, Member <br />127 <br />Murphy complimented college staff on their very respectful relationship with neighbors, <br />128 <br />opining that they were doing a good job. <br />129 <br />Public Comment <br />130 <br />Tim Callaghan, 3062 Shorewood Lane <br />131 <br />Having repeatedly voiced his complaints about athletic noise at Northwestern over the <br />132 <br />years to the college, the Planning Commission, the City Council, and City staff, Mr. <br />133 <br />Callaghan sought to assure the Commission that he had never been contacted by college <br />134 <br />staff. Mr. Callaghan alleged that if they had measured sound levels on his property, they <br />135 <br />had entered his property without his permission, which caused him additional angst. <br />136 <br />Mr. Callaghan advised that he had experienced noise problems since the current public <br />137 <br />address system had been installed, and while he may have called about it infrequently, it <br />138 <br />was not due to an infrequent, but ongoing problem, which the college, the City’s Planning <br />139 <br />Division, nor the City’s former Community Development Director Pat Trudgeon, now the <br />140 <br />City Manager, had done nothing to fix. Mr. Callaghan offered to provide such evidence <br />141 <br />from his e-mails from Mr. Trudgeon stating that “it must be your imagination,” an actual e- <br />142 <br />mail from approximately two years ago. Mr. Callaghan expressed his frustration in <br />143 <br />hearing that the college was doing such a wonderful job controlling sound levels, as he <br />144 <br />assured the Commission that he heard every position a player was at on the field from <br />145 <br />his house, even with the window closed. Since he lived across the lake from the college, <br />146 <br />Mr. Callaghan suggested that maybe the speakers were directed at his residence instead <br />147 <br />of where they belonged. <br />148 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.