My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03283
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03283
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2012 12:40:36 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:01:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3283
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Project Name
Centre Pointe
Applicant
Ryan
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
3/26/2001
Planning Files - Ordinance #
1249
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />It <br /> <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* * * * * * * * * * * <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />, Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 15th day of December, 1999 at 6:00 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Goedeke, Maschka, Wi ski, Mastel and ~all, and the <br />following were absent: None. <br /> <br />Member Wi ski introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION 9724 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPROVED 2000 ANNUAL BUDGET <br />FOR THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City ofRoseville, Minnesota, <br />as follows: <br /> <br />The City ofRoseville's Proposed Budget for 2000 in the amount of$34,009,249 be hereby accepted <br />and approved. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Mastel <br />and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Goedeke, Maschka, <br />Wiski, Mastel and Wall, and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON, said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.