Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Gregg Downing <br />January 17, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />but after April 21, 1997, except that any existing stage or component that <br />was reviewed under a previously completed EA W or EIS need not be <br />included. <br /> <br />In your letter to Mr. Beck, you concluded that once a negative declaration is issued for <br />a project, that project may not be included when determining if a proposed expansion or <br />addition meets or exceeds a threshold and that, if the additional space does not meet the <br />threshold for a mandatory EA W, no further review would be required. <br /> <br />As I indicated to you in our phone conversation, while I have basically reached the <br />same conclusion as you did previously, I have nonetheless advised my client that a <br />discretionary EA W should be prepared for the project to determine if any significant <br />environmental impacts will result from the project. <br /> <br />I would appreciate it if you could provide me with written confirmation whether your <br />interpretation has or has not changed, or whether there have been any rule changes or other <br />interpretations that call this previous conclusion into question. <br /> <br />Thank you again for your assistance. <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br />Campbell Knutson <br />Professional Association <br /> <br />B~---- <br />. amnik <br /> <br />11J <br />Enclosure <br /> <br />cc: Dennis Welsch, Roseville Community Development Director <br />