Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Certain roadway improvements were included in the traffic, and air and noise reports <br />submitted as part of the EA W. The City of Roseville requested these roadway <br />improvements be included as a way to document anticipated future roadway conditions. <br />The MPCA assumed these roadway improvements were needed by the proposed <br />project for adjacent roadways to function at an acceptable level of service. In <br />correspondence dated March 8, 2001 to Innocent Eyoh of the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency from Eric Hesse of Liesch, the project proposer demonstrated that none <br />ofthe roadway improvements described in the traffic report were required for adjacent <br />roadways to function at an acceptable level of service. <br /> <br />Final resolution of this matter will occur as part of the Indirect Source Permit. <br /> <br />Report by: Thomas Paschke (651-490-2236); Dennis Welsch (651-490-2232) <br />Attachments: Summary EA W and comments; Site Plans; original PUD; Planning Commission minutes of January 10, 2001 <br />re: Veritas (p 5-6); City Council minutes of January 22, 2001 re: Veritas (p 5). <br />Draft Resolution and Draft Ordinance <br /> <br />60-Day Time Limit: Not applicable. <br />\\ Victoria\CommDev\Planning Files\3283 _Ryan Co _ Veritas\RCA (03260 I ),doc <br /> <br />7 <br />\ \ Victoria\CommDev\Planning Files\3283 _Ryan Co _ Veritas\RCA (032601).doc <br />