My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03283
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03283
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2012 12:40:36 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:01:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3283
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Project Name
Centre Pointe
Applicant
Ryan
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
3/26/2001
Planning Files - Ordinance #
1249
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />31. <br /> <br />32. <br /> <br />Other Potential Environmental Impacts: If the project may cause any <br />adverse environmental impacts which were not addressed by items 1 through <br />28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. <br /> <br />All known and anticipated environmental impacts were previously addressed in <br />questions 1 through 30. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF ISSUES: (This section need not be completed if the "EAW" <br />is being done for "EfS" scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft <br />Scoping Decision document which must accompany the "EA W".) List any <br />impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation <br />before the project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative <br />measures that have been or maybe considered for these impacts and issues, <br />including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. <br /> <br />1. Traffic - The overall conclusion of the traffic analysis report is that the current <br />proposed Centre Pointe development would not cause any significant negative <br />traffic impacts at the any of the 10 intersections that have been examined. The <br />traffic impacts associated with the current Centre Pointe development <br />proposal are nearly identical to the impacts that would have been experienced <br />with the Centre Pointe development proposals approved in February of2000 <br />and in the spring of 1997. <br /> <br />2. Air Quality - CO levels predicted at each receptor by modeling traffic levels at <br />County Road C are very low. This is because, although it is the busiest <br />intersection by traffic count, the intersection of Cleveland and County Road C <br />is relatively far from the receptor locations established. The CO standards are <br />not projected to be exceeded at any of the receptor locations assuming the <br />project is developed as envisioned, and using the information and methods <br />outlined in the EA W. It is not anticipated that traffic improvements or other <br />mitigation measures will be required to address air quality issues associated <br />with the proposed project. <br /> <br />3. Dust, Odors, Noise - Some dust will be generated during construction, dust <br />will be minimized by various means as described in Item 25. The project will <br />not generate significant odors. Noise impacts during construction may exceed <br />state noise standards for a limited period of time, every effort will be made to <br />reduce construction noise. Predicted noise levels from traffic appear to be <br />moderately lower than the current existing conditions. <br /> <br />Page 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.