Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />line, 21 feet from the east property line and 36 feet from the OHW of Walsh <br />2 <br />Lake. <br />3 <br /> <br />4 <br />c. No other detached accessory structure or garden shed shall be permitted on the <br />5 <br />parcel. <br />6 <br /> <br />7 <br />d. A revised survey indicating the location of the principal structure, front stoop, <br />8 <br />sidewalk, and driveway in relationship to all property line and the OHW, as well <br />9 <br />as the impervious calculation of the same must be submitted with the building <br />10 <br />permit application. <br />11 <br /> <br />12 <br />e. Creation of a 20 foot wide natural vegetative buffer strip adjacent to Walsh Lake <br />13 <br />beginning near the shoreline. <br />14 <br /> <br />15 <br />f. Maintain all remaining mature trees (8 inch or greater) per Section 1016.25D of <br />16 <br />the Roseville City Code. <br />17 <br /> <br />18 <br />g. A contoured grading plan (2 foot increments) must be submitted at the time of <br />19 <br />building permit application that identifies how the parcel will be graded. <br />20 <br /> <br />21 <br />h. Drainage and roof gutters shall be installed to direct runoff away from the <br />22 <br />adjoining (north/south) property. <br />23 <br /> <br />24 <br />i. The variance shall expire within six months after the approval date (March 2, <br />25 <br />2005) unless that applicant has been granted a building permit. <br />26 <br /> <br />27 <br />Member Mulder recalled that he had recommended approval at the original variance. <br />28 <br /> <br />29 <br />Chair Bakeman asked what the setbacks are on adjacent lots. <br />30 <br /> <br />31 <br />Thomas Paschke explained that to the north are 17’ and 37’ setbacks respectively. <br />32 <br /> <br />33 <br />Member Mulder asked for ownership clarification from the staff and applicants. <br />34 <br /> <br />35 <br />Jeff Brown, applicant, explained that he is proposing a structure as close as possible to the <br />36 <br />original variance. The home will be for sale (two story, with two car garage). The garage is <br />37 <br />expanded and creates the need for setback variances. He demonstrated the side and rear <br />38 <br />elevation. The west (rear) will have walkouts on the main and lower level. <br />39 <br /> <br />40 <br />Deb Bloom asked why there is a setback on both sides. There is a house on the south and a <br />41 <br />vacant, non-buildable, lot to the north. Could the south setback be either 9 or 10 feet? <br />42 <br /> <br />43 <br />Member Mulder explained the history of the project from 1997 to present. <br />44 <br /> <br />45 <br />Thomas Paschke explained his review of the variance, the impacts and the flexibility on the site. <br />46 <br /> <br />47 <br />Mr. Brown said he had no problems with proposed conditions. <br />48 <br /> <br />49 <br />Member Mulder asked if there will be a staff review – yes the survey and site plan. What is the <br />50 <br />high water mark. <br />51 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />