050405_VB_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

c. Planning File 3639: Request by Daniel Smith (Dairy Queen), 3070 1 Lexington Avenue, for a Variance to Section 1009 of the Roseville City 2 Code to relocate a pylon sign to within one foot of the property line 3 adjacent to Lexington Avenue. 4 5 6 Chair Bakeman opened the hearing and requested staff to provide a verbal summary of 7 the report dated May 4, 2005. 8 9 Thomas Paschke explained that Daniel Smith of SDDQ (Dairy Queen) seeks approval of 10 a 29 foot Variance to Section 1005.01 to allow the relocation of an existing pylon sign to 11 within one foot of the property line adjacent to Lexington Avenue. The applicant 12 proposes to locate the sign one foot from the wet property line, similar to those sign 13 variances approved at the B-Dale Club, Brentwood Town Offices and Kinderberry Hill 14 Child Care. 15 16 The Staff recommended approval of an29 foot variance to Section 1005.01 (Business 17 District – Minimal Dimensional Requirements)of the Roseville City Code to allow the 18 relocation of a legal conforming pylon sign to no closer than one foot from the property 19 line adjacent to Lexington Avenue (west) based on the findings in Section 5 of the project 20 report dated May 4, 2005, and the following conditions: 21 22 a. The edge of the pylon sign (not the pylon post) must be set back a 23 minimum of 1 foot from the property line adjacent to Lexington Avenue. 24 b. The pylon sign height must be limited to a maximum height of 20 feet 25 above grade. 26 c. The applicant must locate and expose the property corner markers adjacent 27 to Lexington Avenue, prior to the issuance of a sign permit. 28 d. The pylon sign must be internally lit (as currently designed) and externally 29 lit which source may be visible from Lexington Avenue and the adjacent 30 residential properties. 31 e. The sign base (ground) must include some landscaping, including low 32 growing shrubs and perennials. 33 f. The variance (if granted) shall expire within 6 months of its approval if a 34 sign permit is not issued (Section 1013.03). 35 36 Chair Bakeman asked if the adjoining (south property line) spotlight was in the right-of- 37 way. Member Doherty asked the distance of movement from the current location to the 38 new proposed location (approximately 25 feet). Member Boerigter asked if a variance is 39 approved, will the inspection department will verify location and setback. (The inspector 40 will field inspect the setback). 41 42 Dan Smith explained he had no questions with the staff report. The post light (south 43 property line0 would be moved to light the parking lot instead of the sign. 44 45 Marian Hewitt, 3076 North Lexington, explained it was hard to see cars coming down 46 Lexington. In the winter, there is a Christmas tree sale lot. The line of site would be Page 6 of 7