Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 Districts) for the pre-existing non-conforming principal structure allowing <br />2 future structural improvements to a line 10 feet from the Fairview Avenue <br />3 (east) property line near Fairview Avenue; and <br />4 <br />5 B. A 25 foot variance from Section 1004.02D4 (Dwelling Dimensions and <br />6 Appearances and Height, Frontage, Yard, and Lot area Requirements in R-l <br />7 Districts) allowing a five foot addition onto the pre-existing non-conforming <br />8 side wall of the attached garage bringing the structure to a line five feet from <br />9 the east property line near Fairview A venue; and <br />10 <br />11 C. A 23 foot variance from Section 703.04B4 (driveway setback from street <br />12 right-of-way) allowing the pre-existing non-conforming driveway to remain in <br />13 its current location, seven feet from the east property line, near Fairview <br />14 Avenue. <br />15 <br />16 Said recommended approvals shall have the following conditions: <br />17 <br />18 1. The overall dimension of the attached garage shall be limited to a maximum <br />19 width of 17 feet or an eastward addition of five feet in garage width. <br />20 <br />21 2. The proposed garage addition shall be set back a minimum of five feet from <br />22 the east (Fairview corner street side) property line. <br />23 <br />24 3. Any addition to the home or garage (southerly direction) shall not be located <br />25 closer than pre-existing setback of 10 feet from the east property. <br />26 <br />27 4. All roof drainage created by the addition and existing attached garage must <br />28 be collected in gutters and channeled to the natural drainage way for the <br />29 applicant's property (east). <br />30 <br />31 Ayes: 5, Rhody, Olson, Duncan, Cunningham, Mulder <br />32 Nays: 0 <br />33 Motion carried. <br />34 <br />35 This request will be forwarded to the Roseville City Council for action on March 12, 2001. <br />36 <br />37 Member Mulder asked for clarification as to how any city action may be considered <br />38 differently for those hardships created by previous owners. New owners inherit the <br />39 problem when they buy the house. The chimney issue should not be considered a <br />40 hardship. It is not a portion of the pre-existing, non-conforming use determination. <br />41 <br />42 <br />