Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A. <br /> <br />The properly Ol/B qjlJlJesitool/B C@l/Bl/Boit !be plJlJrt ito @ TtelJisol/B@/bEe IJIJse if used under <br />comiittff.oll'ds IJiUUowedi!by ithe offlco@U COlJiJwoU$: Mr. Overbye's apron is <br />approximately 46 feet in width, provides access to the attached garage (adjacent <br />to West Owasso Boulevard), and connects to a drive lame that accesses the rear of <br />the garage. Requiring an apron modification consistent with the City Code (26 <br />feet in width) would prevent/critically limit access to the rear ofthe garage and <br />render the existing drive lane useless. The new driveway apron wm be placed at <br />the property line. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B. The pUigPert ofithe l@l/Bdi OWl/BeTt 0$ dilJlJe rto cirrclJIJm$rtamces lJmoque rto ~he property not <br />crrearted by rthe lal/Bd OWll'derr: The City's Pavement Management Program and the <br />reconstruction of West Owasso Boulevard has required Mr. OveJI"bye to apply for <br />a variance if he wants the existing (or similar) driveway apron width to remain. <br />Mr. Overbye's driveway improvements were constructed prior to the City having <br />a maximum apron width requirement for the public right-of-way. <br /> <br />C. The varroal/Bce, if grr@lJiJrtedi, wiU l/BorJ @UrJerr rthe e$se/J8rtoaU dk@rraCfer of the locality: <br />The proposed 20 foot variance to the required apron width in a public right-of- <br />way will not alter the essential character or the locality, nor adversely affect the <br />public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. <br /> <br />4.0 S1rAJFJF RlECOMMIENDA'fJION <br /> <br />4.1 <br /> <br />Based on the findings outlined in Section 3 staff recommends approval of the request for <br />a variance from Section 703.04Bla of the City Code, to increase the required drive apron <br />width in a public right-of-way from 26 feet to 46 feet for property located at 2916 West <br />Owasso Boulevard. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />S.IID JPJLANNJING ({)(J)MMIJISSJI(Q)N A<C'II'JI(Q)N <br /> <br />5.1 At their meeting of June 12, 2001, the Planning Commission held the pub!ic hearing <br />regarding the Overbye request No citizens addressed the Commission regarding the <br />Overbye request. The Commission having no specific questions of staff or the property <br />owner, recommended (6-0) approval of the request by Mr. OveJI"bye, based on the <br />findings in section 3 of the project report dated June 12,2001. <br /> <br />~.IID SUGGESTED JP:ILANNKNG C(Q)MMKSSK(Q)N AC1fK(Q)N <br /> <br />A((jJ$jp)t at rre~iIDnuntniIDrm tiID ajp)jp)Il'$ve (approve w/modifications or deny) the request by JoOO <br />Overbye for a 20 foot variance to Section 703.04Bla of the Roseville City Code to alRow <br />an increase in the required driveway apron with in a public right-of-way from 26 feet to <br />46 feet for property located at 2916 West Owasso Boulevard, based on the findings in <br />Section 3 ofthe project report dated June 26, 2001. <br /> <br />,,'"'' <br />Prepared by: Thomas Pa~gQke (490-2236) <br />,:;...:(. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Attachments: Property location map; site photo; site plan. <br />60-day Time Limit: Not Applicable - City Initiated Request. <br /> <br />PF3304 RCA (062601) Page 20f2 <br />