Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />II <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br /> <br />forth as a PUD? (no redevelopment is occurring). The building looks like a large <br />house, the large garage may be out of scale. (Lot coverage and garage size do not <br />apply to R-3A sites.) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Member Olson asked for details of the garage access from Haddington. How big a <br />garage is allowed in an R-3A? Would the future garage provide a covered staB <br />for each unit? <br /> <br />Dennis Prokop, 2180 Haddington, explained his plans to improve the building. <br />He will live in one unit. The garage in. back would add privacy cmd separation <br />from the adjoining Goodwill drop off site. He was concerned about the exact <br />dimension of the setback. It is appw..<imately 9'-0" setback, but details will not <br />be known before a lot survey is complete. The four-car garage would anow one <br />car garage per unit (when added to the existing garage stall). <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke suggested language such as "a 9' variance or as determined by a <br />survey prior to Council action". <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked if the two existing garage stalls would remain as ca:r <br />parking or living space. Prokop said he would use it for parking or storage. <br /> <br />Linda Prokop, 2180 Haddington, noted that the objective is to make the house <br />better and live there. <br /> <br />Lucille Eng, 2213 Midlothian Rd., Haddington at County Road B, has another <br />apartment with garages east-to-west. Could this site be changed to a 25-unit <br />building? (Only through hearings and approvals by City Council). Thomas <br />Paschke explained the requirement of tlhe Code allows for six units. Only the <br />comer (south, adjacent lot) is not single family. Traffic is a concern to the <br />neighbors, particularly if this is a large project.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Chair Rhody closed the hearing since there were no further public comments. <br /> <br />Chair Rhody and Jim Mulder disclllssed garage size. (The Code allows for two <br />spaces per unit; one must be enclosed.) <br /> <br />Member Olson expressed concern about the lot coverage (50% ofthe lot or <br />.5FAR can be covered with structures). <br /> <br />Member Cunningham asked if the site could be raised; wlhat is the maximum for a <br />new building (6 units). Member Wilke noted that changes would have to come <br />back to the Planning Commission for review. <br /> <br />A general discussion of lot coverage ensued. There appears to be no other good <br />options to rezoning to R-3A. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Page 3 of II <br />