My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03313
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2007 12:12:51 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:24:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3313
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Date Final City Council Action
5/14/2001
Planning Files - Resolution #
9887
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Purpose of Research and Methodology <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Maxfield Research I conducted this research to determine whether there is evidence to <br />support the claim that tax-credit rental developments for families erode property values in <br />the areas surrounding them. The Family Housing Fund, a Minneapolis-based non-profit <br />agency that supports the development of affordable housing throughout the Twin Cities, <br />funded the research. tf:,_::~.r <br /> <br />We examined 12 n~ighborhoods in the Twin Cities in which a tax-credit rental ho%ing <br />development for families (built between 1993 and mid year 1997) was located withiD a <br />dense district of owner-occupied homes, termed a "subject area." The subject areas <br />generally contained between 150 and 300 owner housing units within one to three blocks. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />We presumed that negative impact by a tax-credit development could be detennined by <br />analyzing three measures of market perfonnance among homes sold in the subject area: <br />sales prices per square foot; the percentages of sales to asking (list) price and; time on the <br />market. Comparing homes sold in each subject area before and after construction of a <br />tax-credit development (a ''pre/post' analysis), as well as comparing'homes sold in each <br />subject area to homes sold in areas without a similar tax-credit development (a <br />"subject/controf' analysis), would reveal the presence of negative ~pact. . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In the pre- and post-construction analysis, we compared market perfonnance in the three <br />years before and after construction start of the tax-credit developments under study " We <br />focused on homes sales that were part of a continuous data set, representing a <br />homogeneous submarket of properties that sold in all or most of the six years under <br />study. In this manner, we analyzed roughly 600 records across 16 submarkets in 11 <br />subject areas. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In the pre- and post-construction analysis, we also addressed the claim that the overall <br />Twin Cities housing market was becoming stronger, and that the subject areas around <br />tax-credit housing simply did not increase in strength as much as they should have. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In the subject versus control analysis, we compared subject area sales in the post- <br />construction years to sales of similar homes (age and size) from the same community and <br />school district, located in areas where there were no tax-credit developments for families <br />built between 1993-1997. We completed 68 subject-control comparisons in this manner, <br />involving roughly 470 subject area records. <br /> <br />I Market Research Partners completed the report under contract with Maxfield Research. <br /> <br />MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.