Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.4 Section 1013.02 requires the applicant to demonstrate a physical hardship and to <br />demonstrate that no practical alternatives exist that would reduce the need for a variance. <br /> <br />3.5 Variances may be granted where the strict enforcement of the literal provisions of the <br />ordinance would cause "undue hardship". The granting of a variance shall only occur <br />when it can be demonstrated that such an action will be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the ordinance. <br /> <br />3.6 "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting a variance means the property <br />in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under conditions allowed by the <br />official controls, the plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the <br />property not created by the land owner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the locality. Specifically to this request: <br /> <br />A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under <br />conditions allowed by the official controls: The Community Development Staff <br />has reviewed the official controls of the City for its potential impact on the <br />subject accessory building request and determined that: <br /> <br />1) Requiring an accessory structure to be placed in accordance with the City <br />Code (a minimum of200 feet) would require the removal of numerous <br />trees and placement of pavement covering a large portion of the front of <br />the house. This requirement is unreasonable especially when considering <br />the location of the majority of home in the area. Except for those homes <br />directly north and south, most homes are located on standard lots with <br />average 30-foot setbacks. Section 1004.01E would require only maximum <br />principal structure setback requirement of 40 feet. <br /> <br />2) The maximum height requirement of 15 feet would not limit Mr. Root in <br />his desire for a 624 square foot accessory building. However, the design <br />affords the structure natural lighting (clearstory) that requires additional <br />height. A clearstory is more practical and requires less maintenance that <br />roof mounted skylights. <br /> <br />B. The plight of the land owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the land owner: The Community Development Department has <br />determined: <br /> <br />1) Mr. Root has a unique situation whereby the house is set back <br />approximately 200 feet from the front (Hamline Avenue) property line. <br />The parcel is 120 feet wide and 307 feet deep and has limited options for <br />new structure placement given the current principal structure location. <br /> <br />2) The parcel is also unique due to its wooded nature, which limits new <br />structure placement, unless trees are removed. The home is substantially <br />screened from Hamline A venue and the adjacent properties. <br /> <br />PF3309 RPCA (071101) Page 2 of3 <br />