My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03321
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2007 12:20:04 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:25:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3321
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
222 NORTH MCCARRONS BLVD
Applicant
Gregg Peterson
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
7/23/2001
Date Final Planning Commission Action
7/11/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Draft Extract of Minutes of Plan nine: Commission Meetine: of 07.11.01: <br /> <br />6(g) Plan nine: File 3321: Gregg & Amy Peterson request for a Variance from Section <br />1012.02B2 of the Roseville City Code to increase the front yard fence height at 222 <br />North McCarrons Boulevard <br /> <br />Chair Rhody opened the hearing and requested Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal <br />summary of the project report dated July 11,2001. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke eXplained that Gregg and Amy Peterson have requested a variance to <br />increase the height of a fence in their front yard from four feet to six feet. The code <br />allows only a four-foot front yard fence. The National Guard Annory is across the street; <br />McCarrons is a busier street. The fence will replace an existing fence. <br /> <br />Staff recommended approval with conditions. <br /> <br />Gregg and Amy Peterson asked for details of recommended conditions: the landscaping <br />required; backing out of garages while protecting a view triangle; fence to be stained <br />earth tone (or red cedar fence). The survey of the lot line will be verified on the site with <br />staff. <br /> <br />Member Mulder asked if Tract C is part of the parcel? (No). The existing fence will <br />remain on the Tract C site. A post will be necessary on the property line (The adjoining <br />property owner has no objection with this plan). <br /> <br />There was no public comment. Chair Rhody closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Duncan moved, seconded by Member Wilke, to recommend approval <br />of the request by Gregg and Amy Peterson for a 2-foot fence height variance from <br />Section 1012.02A2 of the Roseville City Code for property located at 222 North <br />McCarrons Boulevard, based on the findings located in Section 3 and subject to the <br />conditions indicated in Section 4 of the project report dated 7/11/01, as discussed. <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.