Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties. <br />5. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare. <br />6. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan.'; <br /> <br />5.2 Staff has reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in Section <br />10B.0l.D of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concludes the following: <br /> <br />A. The proposed detached accessory building will not create additional traffic nor <br />the need for additional public facilities. <br /> <br />B. The detached accessory building can be partially screened by placing appropriate <br />landscaping along the east property line, even though, the garage will be adjacent <br />a neighboring detached garage. The sides of the garage can be modified with <br />windows to minimize the mass of the west and east sides of the building. <br /> <br />C. The detached accessory structure will not have an impact on the market value of <br />contiguous property. <br /> <br />D. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. <br /> <br />E. The project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation (via the CUP and <br />variance process) as a Low Density Residential use. <br /> <br />5.3 Conditions may be attached to the CUP that would mitigate the impact on adjacent <br />properties including such items as roof gutters for controlling drainage, landscape <br />screening, windows, building materials, and roof truss design. <br /> <br />6.0 POLICY & FISCAL IMPLICATION <br /> <br />6.1 The Comprehensive Plan and the Roseville Housing Improvement Plan encourage <br />maintaining and improving residential properties and infrastructure, as well as <br />reconstruction and rebuilding of residential structures (and neighborhoods) throughout <br />the community. <br /> <br />6.2 There are no additional fiscal implications and no public infrastructure improvements or <br />extensions necessary. <br /> <br />7.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />7.1 Staff proposes the following modified variance: Based on the comments and findings <br />outlined in Section 3, 4, and 5 staff recommends approval ofa 60 square foot variance <br />(compared to the requested 108 sq. ft.) from Section 1004.01A3 and a conditional <br />use permit to allow the construction of a detached accessory building 960 square <br />feet in size for property located at 1166 Laurie Road, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />A. The detached accessory building shall be limited to a size of 24 feet wide by 40 <br />feet deep or 960 square feet. <br /> <br />PF3323 RPCA (071101) Page 40f5 <br />