My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03327
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03327
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2007 12:25:33 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 7:25:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3327
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
691 HEINEL DR
Applicant
Steve Zawadski
Status
Denied
Date Final City Council Action
9/24/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br />of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on Monday, the 13th <br />day of August, 2001, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />Council Member <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION No. <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE REVIEW PERIOD REGARDING A REQUEST <br />BY BAUER HOMES FOR A VARIANCE TO <br />SECTION 1004.02DS OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE <br />FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 691 HEINEL DRIVE (PF3327) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, an application was submitted by Bauer Homes for consideration of a <br />variance to Section 1004.02D5 (Setbacks) on June 11, 2001; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said application was reviewed and accepted as complete by the Community <br />Development Department on June 12, 2001; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said application was continued be the Roseville Planning Commission at <br />their regularly meeting of July 11,2001; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the application was anticipated to be heard by the Commission at their <br />August 8, 2001 meeting; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the applicant was unable to develop the requested and necessary information <br />for the planning Commission to properly consider the variance request; and <br /> <br />WFEREAS, the 60-day review period expires on August 11,2001, thus creating the need <br />for a review extension; <br /> <br />WHEREAS, city staff has requested a 60-day extension to the 60-day review period, <br />pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99, to allow the proper review and consideration of the Bauer <br />Home request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.