Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.0 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />On October 2, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed the annual !UP report <br />on the Agness/Schorn case and recommended 3-2 as follows: <br /> <br />The City has received three types of comments from neighbors: 1) Fix the damaged fence <br />and 2) maintain the front, side, and back yard, 3) no change in comprehensive plan or <br />zoning should be approved. No comments or reports have been submitted by police, fire, <br />or building inspection. The Commission expressed concern that AgnesslSchom did not <br />spend more time to resolve the "snow plow damaged fence" issue as a private issue <br />between property owners. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Duncan moved, seconded by Member Pepper to recommend approval <br />to the City Council (regarding conformance with the conditions of the IUP and <br />continuance of the AgnesslSchom Interim Use Permit), but also that the City not offer the <br />Borders and Buffers program as a fence solution. <br /> <br />Ayes: 3. Duncan, Bakeman, Peper <br />Nays: 2, Stone, Traynor <br />Motion carried <br /> <br />6.0 SUGGESTED ACTION <br /> <br />6.1 Hear public comment. <br /> <br />6.2~Bymotion approve the IUP as in conformance with the conditions of the .' <br />. permit and approve continuance of the Agness/Schorn Interim Use Permi~ <br />with all annual report to.be presented again in October, 2003. j <br /> <br />Report by: Dennis Welsch 490-2232 <br /> <br />Attachment: email from neighbor <br /> <br />Agness/Schorn !UP Review, PF 3329 RCA (101402) Page 5 <br />