pf_03333 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 4.1 Based on the comments and findings outlined in Section 3 staff recommends approval of the variance request by Roseville Covenant Church for property located at 1380 and 1382 County Road C-2. 5.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 5.1 On August 8, 200 I, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding Roseville Covenant Church. At the hearing, one adjacent property spoke in opposition to the request because he was dissatisfied with the previous approved site improvements, mainly screening and landscaping (see attached Draft PC Minutes). 5.2 Based on comments from the adjacent property owner, the Planning Commission directed the staff to review the required site improvements and work with Roseville Covenant Church. The staff did review the previous approval and concluded that the church property was subject to certain conditions placed on the subdivision plat. However, an administrative modification was made regarding the building-wide HV AC equipment. The change was to install ground located units versus rooftop units. Staff inspected the premises and concluded that the property has five (two on the north, two on the south, and one on the east) mechanical equipment areas, each being screened by a three to four foot tall board on board fence. Staff further determined the each of the enclosures could have landscape plantings to assist in creating a more pleasing transition. Staff will work with Roseville Covenant Church on the provision of landscape plantings. This requirement will be handled separately and not in conjunction with the variance request. 5.3 The Commission recommended (7-0) approval of the request by Roseville Covenant Church for a 23-foot variance to Section 1002.02A4 ofthe Roseville City Code, based on the comments and findings in Section 3 of the project report dated August 8, 2001. 6.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION 6.1 Adopt a resolution to approve (approve w/modifications or deny) the request by Roseville Covenant Church for a 23-foot Variance from Section 1002.02A4 ofthe Roseville City Code, based on the comments and findings in Section 3 of the project report dated August 27, 2001. Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (490-2236) Attachments: Property location map; site map; narrative. 60-day Time Limit: Application Accepted on July 26, 2001; 60-Day Review Deadline on September 24,2001. PF3333 RCA (082701) Page 3 of3