Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 2 <br />Trip Generation for Centre Pointe Business Park <br />Approved in Spring 2001 <br /> <br /> PM Peak Hour <br />Land Use Size Daily Entering Exiting Total <br /> Trips Trips <br />General Office 230,311 sq. ft. 2007 49 239 288 <br />Corporate Office 383,157 sq. ft, 2874 51 413 464 <br />Business Hotel 189 Rooms 1374 70 47 117 <br />Business Hotel 125 Rooms 909 47 31 78 <br />Quality Restaurant 85 Seats 243 15 7 22 <br />Single Tenant Office 6,600 sq. ft. 76 2 10 12 <br />Subtotal 7483 234 747 981 <br />10% Multi Use Reduction -748 -23 -75 -98 <br />Net New Trips 6735 211 672 883 <br /> <br />The current trip generation potential was also estimated through the use of Trip Generation <br />resulting in the information provided in Table 3. The estimate includes the same ten-percent <br />shared trip reduction factor. <br /> <br />Table 3 <br />Trip Generation for Current Proposed <br />Centre Pointe Business Park <br /> <br /> PM Peak Hour <br />Land Use Size Daily Entering Exiting Total <br /> Trips Trips <br />General Office 230,311 sq. ft. 2007 49 239 288 <br />Corporate Office 383,157 sq. ft. 2874 51 413 464 <br />Business Hotel 189 Rooms 1374 70 47 117 <br />Business Hotel 125 Rooms 909 47 31 78 <br />Quality Restaurant 85 Seats 243 15 7 22 <br />Single Tenant Office 21,500 sq. ft. 249 5 22 37 <br />Subtotal 7,656 237 759 996 <br />10% Multi Use Reduction -766 -24 -76 -100 <br />Net New Trips 6,890 213 683 896 <br /> <br />A comparison of the current trip generation estimate with the original estimate and the Spring <br />2001 estimate shows that the daily trip generation potential is 499 trips less than the original <br />estimate but 155 greater than the Spring 2001 estimate. The peak hour potential is 112 greater <br />than the original and 13 greater than the Spring 2001 estimate. <br /> <br />Capacity Analysis <br /> <br />The estimated site generated traffic has been distributed through the study area intersections and <br />combined with the baseline traffic. The study intersections were then reanalyzed to reflect the 13 <br />additional peak hour site generated trips. Table 4 compares the results of the approved 2001 land <br />use with the current proposed use. <br />