My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02491
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2400
>
pf_02491
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:31:34 PM
Creation date
12/9/2004 1:13:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2491
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2965 SNELLING AVE N
Project Name
COLLEGE PROPERTIES
Applicant
SENTMAN, PAUL PAUL'S PLACE
Status
Approved
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />structure will meet all applicable setbacks and will be <br />constructed of high quality materials compatible with <br />the design of the other buildings in the PUD, and will <br />be adequately landscaped on all sides, especially toward <br />Snelling Avenue. Compliance with these issues shall be <br />determined by the City Development Review Committee. If <br />the Development Review Committee believes that the <br />design does not fit within these guidelines, this <br />portion of the project will be referred to the Planning <br />Commission and City Council for an amendment to the PUD. <br /> <br />12. That ownership of the Simpson parcel be finalized before <br />any final approvals are given for the PUD that might <br />affect that property. A plan for interim use of the <br />parcel should be developed and reviewed by staff. <br /> <br />13. That as much vegetation as possible along the creek be <br />left intact. <br /> <br />'14. That the possibility of installing stop signs on Lincoln <br />Drive at the entrance to the independent living facility <br />be studied. <br /> <br />15. That staff review traffic count methodology. <br /> <br />16. That the ponds be maintained by applicant and designed <br />to meet Metropolitan Council recommended standards. <br />Staff should review and recommend a maintenance schedule <br />if appropriate. <br /> <br />17. That the applicant be encouraged to increase evergreen <br />materials. <br /> <br />18. That there be strong architectural continui ty for the <br />entire project. Staff should review all future <br />development to insure that continuity is maintained. <br /> <br />The Planning commission also unanimously recommended that the <br />comprehensive plan designation of the site be changed from <br />medium density residential and business to high density <br />residential, business and institutional. <br /> <br />4. Two neighborhood meetings have occurred as well as a meeting <br />with the immediately abutting property owners. <br /> <br />5. The City Council, at its April 26, 1993 meeting, on a 2-2-1 <br />vote, failed to pass an ordinance to rezone the site. The <br />City Council passed a resolution creating TIF District #13 <br />for the proposed project. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />College <br />living <br />by 15 <br />132. <br /> <br />Properties, Inc. has redesigned the independent <br />building to reduce the overall height of the building <br />feet and to reduce the number of units from 140 to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.