Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FO?R..1Ft <br /> <br />Senior Household Projections .f? DISO COpy, <br /> <br />Based on 1990 age distribution data, we have projected the~~ ~enior house- <br />holds in Roseville and the study area in 1995 and 2000. These fo"t{/Ms are based on <br />cohort survival rates for Minnesota from 1990 and assume no net change due to mi- <br />gration. Based on our calculations, Roseville will have approximately 3,900 senior <br />households in 1995 and 4,300 senior households in 2000, increases of 500 and 900 <br />households (respectively) from 1990. The study area as a whole is forecast to have <br />approximately 11,000 senior households in 1995 and 12,900 senior households in 2000. <br />These are increases of 2,000 households from 1990 to 1995 (a growth rate of 22 per- <br />cent) and 3,900 households from 1990 to 2000 (a growth rate of 43 percent). For the <br />study area, the numerical senior household increase forecast for the 1990's is slightly <br />below that which occurred during the 1980's. <br /> <br />! <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />j <br /> <br />Senior Household Income <br /> <br />Table 9, shows household income data for study area senior households in 1989 from <br />the 1991 census. The table shows that there were 2,442 senior households (76 per- <br />cent of the total) in Roseville with incomes of $15,000 or more in 1989. There were <br />1,629 senior households, 48 percent of the total, with incomes of $25,000 or more. <br /> <br />Senior incomes in the study area overall were only slightly lower, with 72 percent at <br />$15,000 or more (6,494 households) and 47 percent having incomes of $25,000 or <br />more. In terms of age, study area households headed by someone 75 or older were <br />more likely to have a lower income than those with a 65 to 74 year-old householder. <br />About 59 percent of 75 + households fell in the lowest income group (less than <br />$15,000) while only 21 percent of the younger households were in this income group. <br /> <br />Senior Household Tenure <br /> <br />Seniors who oWn their homes have an untapped source of income that can be used to <br />support alternative housing. Upon the sale of their home, seniors can invest the pro- <br />ceeds and use the income dollar for dollar to support their housing and service needs. <br />Table 10 shows the number an percent of senior households who owned and rented <br />their housing in 1990. <br /> <br />The table reveals that more than three quarters of all study area householders age 65 <br />and over owned their housing in 1990 while just 63 percent of householders age 75 <br />and over own their housing. Older seniors are more likely to have sold their home <br />and moved to rental housing, shedding the cost and responsibility of home main- <br />tenance. Still, there were nearly 2,100 older senior (age 75 and over) householders in <br />the study area who owned their housing in 1990. <br /> <br />The proportion of seniors who own their homes is greater in the study area than in <br />the metropolitan area; 71 percent of all senior householders in the metropolitan area <br />owned their housing in 1990 compared to 76 percent in the study area. Among older <br />seniors, 60 percent own their housing in the metropolitan area compared to 63 <br />percent in the study area. Numerically, the study area has nearly 6,900 senior hpuse- <br /> <br />'23 <br />