CC_Minutes_2014_1006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 6,2014 Page 15 retaining wall, and necessary changes made to accommodate the property owner and the need to lower the roadway grade during the project due to MSA construc- tion requirements. Mayor Roe opened the Public Hearing at approximately 7:36 p.m. and reviewed the procedures; with City Manager Trudgeon again recognizing the two written objections received to-date as previously noted. Public Comment Brian Stenquist, 1022 County Road D West Mr. Stenquist read a portion of the written comments submitted in opposition to their assessment. N. Nancy Misra, 1022 County Road D West In addition to her husband's comments, Ms. Misra reviewed their attendance at all meetings held by the former City Engineer prior to construction including on-site visits, opining that they had been assured that the slope of their driveway would actually decrease and that the surface of the road had actually been higher prior to the project. However, Ms. Misra noted that the results were much different than promised, making it difficult in the winter to maneuver in the driveway and with snow removal. Ms. Misra advised that, prior to the project, they had contracted with a contractor to install a turnaround, but after completion of the driveway in November of 2013, their contractor informed them that due to the new slope of the driveway, it would not be feasible without considerable additional cost. Ms. Misra advised that this spring, City Engineer Culver had authorized modifications of their retaining wall, for which they were grateful, since the original retaining wall went to the end of and up their driveway, raising the area between 3' to 4' and in order to get snow up over the wall, they had to purchase a new snow blow- ers. Ms. Misra noted that this was not exclusive of their property, with adjacent neighbors having similar issues, including having a great deal of frustration dur- ing the project and having to park several blocks away for 2-3 months. Ms. Misra opined that this was a difficult process and she felt they hadn't ended up with a project with good results. Ms. Misra noted that their original concrete driveway had rebar, which was removed and not replaced with the new concrete; and stated that they had already seen it heaving after less than a year in place. Among other negative effects, Ms. Misra advised that the new project had not served to slow traffic down at all; and the new roadway was less than 3' from their mailbox and very dangerous. Ms. Misra also advised that all mailboxes were reinstalled at a lower level, which she anticipated would cause the City to hear from residents during the winter when they were covered over by snow plows. Ms. Misra opined that it would have been better for the City to have consulted with residents prior to reinstalling the mailboxes and replaced them as they were originally. Overall, Ms. Misra opined that with the excessive sloping portion of their driveway, the road had served to complicate their routine lives, especially over the winter.