My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1006
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2014 2:35:35 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 2:35:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/6/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 6,2014 <br /> Page 17 <br /> Mr. Culver further noted that as part of water main work, the City needed waivers <br /> of trespass to go further into private properties in order to re-grade them accurate- <br /> ly. Mr. Culver advised that the sidewalk remained in the existing and current <br /> rights-of-way and no additional right-of-way acquisition was required. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested that the City's policy should be reviewed <br /> going forward to ensure that the homeowner's standards were met or retained <br /> when something is removed (e.g. driveways). Councilmember McGehee further <br /> opined that in both of these cases, residents were dissatisfied with the final drive- <br /> way grade, and the situation may have been avoided or alleviated in both cases if <br /> the driveways were reinstalled to meet their requirements rather than just City <br /> policy. Councilmember McGehee further opined that retaining walls installed <br /> next to driveways were problematic for almost anyone during the winter months. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted another problematic policy issue for her was <br /> when residents cleared their driveways and then the City plows came through and <br /> dumped snow on their driveways already cleared. Councilmember McGehee <br /> opined that the City had an obligation to remove the snow. <br /> McGehee moved to consider an adjustment to the properties filing formal written <br /> appeal as evidenced with photographic evidence. <br /> Mayor Roe requested a specific adjustment figure; with Councilmember McGe- <br /> hee not offering a specific number without further City Council discussion. <br /> Mayor Roe deemed this not an actual motion; and with Councilmember McGehee <br /> suggesting reducing the assessment by $15 per linear foot, at approximately $45 <br /> per foot, a second was not offered and Mayor Roe declared the motion failed for <br /> lack of a second. <br /> Councilmember Willmus moved utilizing MSA dollars to pay for the project and <br /> not assess for it at all, Mayor Roe ruled the motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> McGehee moved TABLING action until further guidance was provided by staff; <br /> with Mayor Roe asking for what that specific guidance would be. With no addi- <br /> tional comment coming from the body, Mayor Roe declared the motion failed for <br /> lack of a second. <br /> McGehee moved to request staff to evaluate in some manner the issues imposed <br /> by lowering the street grade and subsequent installation of steeper graded drive- <br /> ways, as well as other issues regarding the reinstalled concrete different than had <br /> been existing situation. With Mayor Roe seeking specifics on whether the motion <br /> was to direct staff to recommend different assessment amounts on those two par- <br /> cels; or if the motion to table was based on all parcels or only those two under <br /> discussion. With no additional comment coming from the body, Mayor Roe de- <br /> clared the motion failed for lack of a second. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.