CC_Minutes_2014_1006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 6,2014 Page 23 tial areas of cutback, and positive or negative impacts with those decisions, and make them part of the upfront discussions. City Manager Trudgeon suggested a follow-up question for future surveys to pro- vide insight and benefit discussions as respondents identified what specific ser- vices should be considered differently—whether increased or reduced. Mayor Roe noted that Morris-Leatherman had highlighted some of those areas: public safety and recommended increasing or shifting a percentage of the budget resources toward that effort, which had not yet been part of the discussion to this point. Councilmember Willmus opined that City Manager Trudgeon addressed his in- tent, that it should be a combination of staff recommendations and direction to staff from the City Council as a response to resident survey findings. As budget discussions continue, City Manager Trudgeon suggested that as it was decided where the final budget should end up, staff would welcome any input and/or suggestions from the City Council or any ideas to take into account to de- termine impacts. Councilmember Laliberte echoed the comments of City Manager Trudgeon in a follow-up question for future surveys; but in the meantime suggestions by indi- vidual Councilmembers and staff were a great way to move forward. Coun- cilmember Laliberte advised, that in her request to discuss the community survey in the concept of the annual budget was to do so in generalities (e.g. public safety issues, aging infrastructure and rising crime), the City Council should hold itself accountable in its budget process and the discussions should pay attention to sur- vey responses; and if a need was indicated to fund something based on public per- ception it needed to match reality and where resources would come from. Specific to public safety issues, Councilmember McGehee noted that while the public found it important, on the other hand, 91% of respondents indicated that neighborhood patrolling was about right and thought they were well covered,with other responses indicating that 80% of those responding thought they were getting good value for their services. In conjunction with Councilmember McGehee's comments, Councilmember Et- ten noted the differences in response rates when applied to a pie chart, which re- sulted in the issue looking bigger than it actually was. Councilmember Etten con- curred with the suggestion made by City Manager Trudgeon, that while in general people may love the things around them and the services they received, it didn't mean those issues shouldn't be addressed, but consideration was needed as to how they may become magnified on a pie chart and pull the City Council in the wrong direction or a different way.