My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1006
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2014 2:35:35 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 2:35:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/6/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 6, 2014 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Culver noted that the developer was making good faith efforts to-date in meeting <br /> requirements, including a shared parking arrangement with the adjacent church to <br /> make the best use of the site. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Culver confirmed that a 10' versus 25' grassed <br /> easement would remain rather than the current wooded easement, as the developer <br /> would need to clear some of that area making it more open than today. Also, Mr. <br /> Culver noted, with the shared parking lot on the west side of the parcel, it would <br /> allow for easier access through their parking lot for any maintenance required. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned if there was any existing pipe structure into <br /> that pond from County Road B-2 or if it was simply overland flow. <br /> Mr. Culver advised that staff had not been able to find any"as builts" indicating a <br /> documented pipe; however, he noted that there appeared to be some sort of origi- <br /> nating pipe into the inlet drainage, but no visible outlet indicated making its histo- <br /> ry or purpose difficult to ascertain. Mr. Culver noted that it did convey water into <br /> the pond, since there was no curb there, but there was still sufficient water and <br /> overland flow as well. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated his one concern was with the structure piping <br /> stormwater directly from the road to the pond, in heavy rain events, there could <br /> possibly be a situation that the pond filed and cause water issues for residents on <br /> the north of the site. <br /> Mr. Culver clarified that there was sufficient overflow on the north end and would <br /> therefore control the high water element, alleviating those concerns. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that by vacating a portion of the existing ease- <br /> ment, there was even more drainage capacity being taken away, since the current <br /> swale provides for some infiltration. Councilmember McGehee stated that in this <br /> situation, as well as the other consent agenda item she pulled, she wanted to see <br /> the City address this in terms of GreenStep Cities and water quality concerns and <br /> preferred to reduce the number of underground pipe solutions that ultimately end <br /> up allowing stormwater into ponds whenever significant rain events overwhelm <br /> them. Councilmember McGehee further asked that more trees be retained along <br /> that overland pathway and the swale be put back in behind the curb or a rain gar- <br /> den installed behind the curb to provide better and more infiltration rather than <br /> having to be so reliant on reducing our access and infiltration opportunities to ac- <br /> commodate development. Councilmember McGehee suggested there may be a <br /> way for the developer to work around this for the whole area versus clear cutting <br /> it. Since there was currently no tree preservation program that could sufficiently <br /> address the situation, Councilmember McGhee opined that from an environmental <br /> standpoint, the fewer pipe solutions the better where not necessary; and reiterated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.