My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1006
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2014 2:35:35 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 2:35:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/6/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 6, 2014 <br /> Page 7 <br /> that the structure could be modified. Councilmember McGehee stated that she <br /> was not in favor of reducing this easement. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Culver clarified the easement area <br /> provided on the west end via the church property; and confirmed that staff could <br /> find no historical information on why the City had initially retained the full width <br /> of the easement area or obtained it. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Etten, Mr. Culver addressed the impervious sur- <br /> face requirement for this development. Councilmember Etten expressed concern <br /> in losing the natural amenities (e.g. trees)in this area. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the property would be required to meet the lakeshore buffer <br /> requirements for impervious surface as well as those dictated by the particular use <br /> of the property. <br /> McGehee moved, Etten seconded, to TABLE action to a date not specific; direct- <br /> ing staff to work with the developer to address concerns raised tonight, for the <br /> parcel at 197 County Road B-2. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified with City Attorney Mark Gaughan that this motion to table <br /> was appropriate without requiring another Public Hearing at the Planning Com- <br /> mission level; but did not preclude hearing additional public comment when the <br /> issue came before the City Council in the future. City Attorney Gaughan also <br /> noted that the 60-day review timeframe did not apply as this request had been ini- <br /> tiated by staff rather than the developer. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Approve a Resolution Approving the Vacation of Drainage and Utility <br /> Easements Located along Lots 18—21,Block 1, O'Neil's Addition <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, City Manager Trudgeon briefly reviewed the re- <br /> quest as detailed in the RCA dated October 6, 2014. <br /> Councilmember McGehee sought clarification that this request was for the pur- <br /> pose of cleaning up the utility easement, currently extending 32.9' in a swath <br /> where the utility easement now lies, and now expanding the utility and drainage <br /> easement 32.9' from where it was now. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon concurred, and Mayor Roe clarified that that was the di- <br /> mension on the westerly edge. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.