My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1020
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2014 2:43:04 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 2:41:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/20/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 20,2014 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Mr. Mueller provided a personal history of this lot; and reviewed his revisions <br /> with this concept plan to address concerns expressed by findings of denial for his <br /> previous application (e.g. trees, storm water and parking). Mr. Mueller reviewed <br /> the proposed lot lines, current and proposed tree inventory with his extensive <br /> plantings over the years with most remaining on the outside property line; and <br /> changes in topography and drainage routes from filling in depressions by neigh- <br /> boring property owners. Mr. Mueller reviewed his perception of stormwater <br /> drainage now and what he proposed; and his intent to assist Mr. Romanoski's cur- <br /> rent property drainage issues as part of his redevelopment. <br /> Mr. Mueller opined that his plan would help several neighboring property owners <br /> with their drainage concerns; and was currently seeking an easement from Mr. <br /> Cross to facilitate his proposed drainage route outlined in this concept plan. <br /> Mr. Mueller further addressed stormwater outflow, which he intended to handle <br /> through an old cesspool that he built in 1949 and still usable. Mr. Mueller ad- <br /> vised that he had consulted the Rice Creek Watershed District regarding their cal- <br /> culation (16,800 gallons) for the stormwater pond's absorption rate, with his en- <br /> gineer still needing to figure out the choices beyond needing an adjacent property <br /> condemned. Mr. Mueller stated that he wanted to get along with his neighbors <br /> while also helping resolve any current drainage issues; and therefore, was willing <br /> to have an easement across his land to facilitate that drainage. <br /> Councilmember Etten thanked Mr. Mueller for providing this preliminary concept <br /> plan; however, in hearing City Engineer Culver talk about the amount of flow re- <br /> quired to come around and be shifted, he was concerned with the amount of grad- <br /> ing required; and suggested another way be considered to slow that flow so it <br /> would overflow back into the City storm sewer system versus having to be routed <br /> around two homes for such a great distance. With the additional impervious sur- <br /> face proposed, Councilmember Etten opined that this was of concern to him. <br /> Mr. Mueller invited individual Councilmembers to walk his property versus look- <br /> ing at it on a map to gain a better understanding of the topography, noting that his <br /> yard already absorbed stormwater runoff from neighboring properties already. <br /> In response to Councilmember concerns and comments, Community Develop- <br /> ment Director Bilotta advised that as staff proceeded through an approval process, <br /> and when an engineer was brought on board by Mr. Mueller, discussion would in- <br /> clude distributing ponds on Acorn Road and back to minimize grading, but <br /> thanked Councilmembers for their input as staff moved forward, especially spe- <br /> cific to Councilmember Etten's concerns regarding overland flow of water, vol- <br /> ume and movement. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she had concerns with the additional imper- <br /> vious surface. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.