My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1020
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2014 2:43:04 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 2:41:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/20/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 20, 2014 <br /> Page 14 <br /> erty and area, staff would attempt further research between Mr. Mueller's proper- <br /> ty and the inlet and provide any additional information to Mr. Mueller. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that, once more was known about the grading plan and tree im- <br /> pact, even if all the trees were eventually preserved along the outside exterior, his <br /> question remained as to whether that part of the property was being used to move <br /> water, and how that would impact the overall area. <br /> Mr. Mueller advised that he would replant any trees to the new homes would not <br /> be visible from the road. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she was more interested in infiltration than <br /> an outflow pond to provide some filtering of the storm water. <br /> At the request of City Manager Trudgeon, Community Development Director Bi- <br /> lotta reviewed the next steps, including additional preferences expressed by the <br /> City Council for a 32' wide road with parking on the street versus a series of pads <br /> around the edge; and sought further clarification as to whether or not their prefer- <br /> ence for that 32' was for a private or public roadway. Regarding the stormwater <br /> issue, Community Development Director Bilotta noted his understanding that the <br /> City Council preferred maximizing infiltration opportunities, and determining <br /> how best to get to the public output. <br /> The Council majority seemed to favor a private versus public roadway, however, <br /> were flexible depending on other elements. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that staff review parking needs and determine the best <br /> compromise between a road and driveway, and which approach was best, whether <br /> the road ended up 32' or not. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she hated to see a 32' road due to the addi- <br /> tional impervious surface; however, she stated that she didn't want to see eight car <br /> parking pads either, but didn't know what the balance actually was. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee stated that she would prefer only three lots/homes and no <br /> more. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that Mr. Mueller work with staff to determine actual park- <br /> ing needs. <br /> Community Development Director Bilotta clarified that his understanding of <br /> Council directive was to reduce impervious surface as much as possible, whatever <br /> works the best, with street width or overflow parking areas, and whether best as <br /> public or private parking. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.