My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1020
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2014 2:43:04 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 2:41:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/20/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 20,2014 <br /> Page 17 <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that City Manager Trudgeon had attended the <br /> Village's presentation; and she as happy to find that the haulers provided walk-up <br /> service for residents unable to get their containers to the end of the driveway; and <br /> questioned if they had included larger items as well. Councilmember McGehee <br /> referenced the City of White Bear Lake's use of organized collection, including <br /> pick up of larger items. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon advised that it would be hard to know as those things <br /> were usually subject to negotiation with a hauler; and the consortium perhaps in- <br /> cluded the service for an additional fee that was found favorable by the Village. <br /> Regarding the White Bear Lake organized collection, Mr. Trudgeon noted that <br /> they had a long-standing service that had evolved over the years. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed his curiosity in whether the comparisons were <br /> actually apples to apples, and what savings were actually available not only for <br /> the first year of the contract, but through annual consumer price index (CPI) ad- <br /> justments in years three through five. Councilmember Willmus noted his concern <br /> with other communities having gone that route, such as St. Louis Park that had <br /> moved to a single hauler, with their rates jumping significantly over the last year. <br /> Given the information provided, Councilmember Willmus stated that he just <br /> didn't see that there was any significant savings in moving in this direction. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon noted that that was really no comprehensive study of <br /> those rates available, since the Village of St. Anthony was the first municipality to <br /> move this direction under the new law; and he wasn't sure if the rates varied on a <br /> consumer to consumer basis, or they varied widely; also making it hard to predict <br /> for Roseville what would happen without initiating the negotiating process and in- <br /> flators. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte thanked staff for bringing the additional infoiniation <br /> forward. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding the number of haulers originally serving the Village <br /> of St. Anthony with each firm and their respective routes included in the consorti- <br /> um; the smaller geographical area of St. Anthony compared to the larger area en- <br /> compassed by Roseville; and implications and deadlines for the Ramsey County <br /> mandate for a development by 2016 of a plan for curbside collection of organics <br /> in the community; and implementation shortly thereafter. <br /> Councilmember Etten questioned if staff had outlined a plan to achieve that man- <br /> date. <br /> Public Works Director Schwartz responded that the current Eureka Recycling <br /> contract provided for those discussions over the next year, and while discussions <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.