My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_1020
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_1020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2014 2:43:04 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 2:41:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/20/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 20, 2014 <br /> Page 18 <br /> have been initiated by City staff with Ramsey County staff, it remained a work in <br /> progress. <br /> Councilmember Etten questioned if an outcome would be changing recycling to <br /> weekly pick-up with the addition of organics; with Mr. Schwartz responding that <br /> this was a question, whether to incorporate organic collection with garbage collec- <br /> tion versus recycling collections. <br /> Mayor Roe referenced the U of MN-Mankato study with a projected completion <br /> date of February of 2014, and sought the status of that study from Mr. Schwartz. <br /> Public Works Director Schwartz advised that the study tool was available, and <br /> staff could provide a demonstration of road design predictions of wear and tear <br /> predicted in dollar amounts based on the number and frequency of trucks on a <br /> road; and using design parameters and predicting those costs, but not used to af- <br /> fect road design but rather predicting which roads would last longer based on <br /> travel patterns and axel weight. Mr. Schwartz advised that the study tool was <br /> based on the same road design model used in the past by the Metropolitan Coun- <br /> cil, and remained a standard proven over time and many years of research, having <br /> evolved over the years. Mr. Schwartz also noted that the model considered road <br /> durability depending on tonnage and axel weight of trucks, and assumed roadway <br /> materials were of the highest quality available. <br /> The consensus of the body was that they would appreciate that type of infor- <br /> mation going forward. The Council concurred it was looking for that type of in- <br /> formation <br /> Unless hearing a different direction from his colleagues, Councilmember Willmus <br /> suggested that the community survey continue to ask this question about orga- <br /> nized collection; however, he thought it was very clear based on survey results <br /> that the community was not yet supportive of organized collection. Therefore, <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that he was not an advocate of moving forward <br /> without that majority support of the community. <br /> As a follow-up for additional information from the public safety aspect with gar- <br /> bage trucks going down streets, Mayor Roe asked staff to research any accident <br /> data and factor that in to future discussions if sufficiently documented. <br /> Councilmember McGehee suggested changing the survey question wording to in- <br /> clude the consortium option, as that option was not identified in the most recent <br /> survey. Councilmember McGehee questioned whether there was any downside in <br /> initiating the 60-day review period and discussion with haulers to see what they <br /> would propose, especially if consideration was given to safety in having fewer <br /> trucks on your street and thereby reducing overall costs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.