Laserfiche WebLink
AttachmentE <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of <br />the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 10 day of <br />th <br />November 2014 at 6:00 p.m. <br />The following Members were present: ______________; <br />and the following Members were absent: ________. <br />Council Member _________ introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. _______ <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGNS AS AN <br />INTERIM USE AT 1880 PERIMETER DRIVE (PF14-020) <br />WHEREAS, Spire Credit Union has applied for approval of the proposed <br />temporary construction signs as an in conjunction at 1880 Perimeter Drive; <br />INTERIM USE <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing <br />regarding the proposed on October 8, 2014, voting 5 – 0 to recommend <br />INTERIM USE <br />approval (with conditions) of the use based on testimony offered at the public hearing as <br />well as the information and analysis provided with the staff report prepared for said <br />public hearing; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has determined that approval of the <br />proposed will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding properties <br />INTERIM USE <br />based on the following findings: <br />a.The proposed construction signs would not cause such impacts and could easily <br />be removed from the premises and therefore the would not have <br /> INTERIM USE <br />significant negative impact on the land <br />b.The does not constitute an excessive burden on streets, parks, or <br />INTERIM USE <br />other facilities because the requested is for the placement of signs on <br />INTERIM USE <br />a yet-to-be-developed property; <br />c.Given the setback distance of the two proposed temporary signs from property <br />line, it has been determined that safety for vehicles traveling along Perimeter <br />Drive would not be compromised and that any unsightliness of the signs over <br />time can be addressed either by City removal or property owner upgrade of the <br />signs. Therefore, the proposed installation of two construction signs on the <br />premises would not be injurious to the surrounding neighborhood or otherwise <br />harm the public health, safety, and general welfare. Additionally, the proposed <br />signs will also be beneficial because they will advertise the ownership of the <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />