pf_02017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

/_, 'f ,.,,- REQUEST fOR CGUNCIL AC:rON DATE: lD-23-89 ITE!\~ :,:0 ~ : -- ~ f'0partment APP"reval: r,. I, ~I \ : I J. I, , /A/V' ) / I - J ,i.J Item Descr1P\1en: M,ncger Reviewed: Agenda Section: .~'-.I.^ '- '\ '. ) Hearing ReI. Reinr.ardt request for rezoning froT': R-l to R-3A and variances to alla-....- a 0 root parking setback an1 to allow a 1-1/2 stcry ~partment building with li2 story belo~ grade at 23Sl N. Dale Street. The Roseville Planning cOffiJ'"TIissicn, at its October 4" 1939 TI1Get.ing. unanimously recommended approval of rezoning the site from F.-I to R- 3A. The Planning Commission, on ~ 4-2 vote, reco~7.end~d approval of the variances with the fOllowing conrtiticns: 1. Final approval of utilities and drainage by the Engineering Department. 2. Final approval of the landscape 91an by staff, ~. Final approval of the sit~ plan by the fire Marshal. ~ _ Dedication of ~s :Ht '-:f right.,'-f-....ay along Dale Street for the ~ ::-operty in ques'tio.-" 5, Fili 19 of zasements {:l :.viding COTI'mcn access to the four contiguous effected prQP~rty owr.:YS for vehicle purp~ses, 6, That funds De placed in escrow for a 5 fact sidew-alk as required aloag Dale street. 7. That the apartment be develop\o:d in accorda:-,ce \.;ith the pLms 5~1bmitted and preser.tecl ta the Planning Ccmr1issjl)j\ O!1 Dctot!'>l' 4, 1989. The Pl.:::nning Commission c.lso requested st<1ff to investigate and rer.crt to the Council its findinas ccncerniny ,.;h\" leI feet ,,'CIS not dedicated ~long Dale Street on th~ parcel to ':!1€' -no1'1:.11 ~f the site ir. question when it was appn:.ved previo>lsly. staff revie",ed the files an~ found that the dedication was snc~n on vlans sub~itted and the dedication was discussed in Hcw~:1:'d Dahlgr~n' s repo~.t, The 3pplica~t has indicated that th~re was no dedication bec3lJse, at the t;me, the county did not \Jant it. staff has discussed tr.e 8atter '"i tt', na-,~)sey County staff and they have st..ted th~t the County :"",i1st,er