Laserfiche WebLink
<br />plan has ~lways required additional right-of-way on that parcel an~ <br />that they could not explain why the right-of-way was not obtained. <br />The Planning Commission also asked staff to obtain a legal opinion <br />from the City Attorney's office on whether or not the City could <br />legally require riedi:::aticn on the parcel north of the si~e in <br />question at this ti~e. The city Attorney's office has stated th~~ <br />the City could net legally require the applicant to dedicar.e 10 feet <br />at this tiree cn the parcel to the north because it does net relcte <br />to the action before the City at this time, <br /> <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve/deny Ken Reinhardt's <br />request for rezoning flom R-l to R-3A ar~ <br />variances to allow a 0 foot parking <br />setback and to allow a 1-1/2 story <br />apartment building with 1/2 story belcw <br />grade at 2381 N. Dale street ',,'i th the <br />aforeme.ntioned conditions if so desired. <br /> <br />Motion to approve/ceny ordinance to <br />rezone property from R-l to R-3A. <br />