My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-11-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2014
>
2014-11-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2014 3:26:25 PM
Creation date
11/20/2014 3:01:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/25/2014
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
33 ..." <br />34 Page 7, Line 305 (Wozniak) <br />35 Typographical correction from "The Lode" to The Lodge" <br />36 • Page 9, Lines 387-389 (Wozniak) <br />37 Delete lines in their entirety (Recording Secretary's original notes <br />38 inadvertently not deleted previously). <br />39 • Page 11, Line 456 (Seigler) <br />40 Correct to read. "... hundreds of thousands of dollars in their homes..." <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />56 <br />4. <br />Page 16, Lines 694 — 698 (Gjerdingen) <br />Correct to read: "Member Gjerdingen requested a review of current sidewalk <br />policies in place for public information (e.g. ,seasonal sidewalk maintenance) <br />that are publically posted, whether electronically or written — and what is <br />legally written out for review, and also current lawL. This could include a <br />recommendation to the Parks & Ration Commiss'on and/or City Council <br />if the PWETC found any gaps." <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Communication Items <br />Mr. Schwartz and Mr. CuIr" <br />ie y reviewed project updates and maintenance <br />activities listed in the staff report dated October 28, 2014. <br />57 In response to numerous phone calls, and questions the PWETC, Mr. Culver <br />58 explained the recent addition of blue lights on random traffic signals by Ramsey <br />59 County, and their purpose. Mr. Culver advised that a grant had been received by <br />60 Ramsey County to assist in addressing frkluent running of red lights; with this <br />61 tool currently used in other areas across the State of Minnesota, and called "red <br />62 light confirmation lights" or "blue enforcement lights." Mr. Culver noted that <br />63 ese lights are installed on the back side of the signal head it's mimicking, with <br />64 lue light on when the opposing red light is on. Mr. Culver noted that the <br />65 int s that the officer can be on the far side of the intersection and if a vehicle <br />66 proceeds on a red light, it can be aware of that and intercept the vehicle when it <br />67 reaches their location, creating a safer enforcement option for one officer to <br />68 manage. Mr. Culver noted that these lights had been used successfully to -date on <br />69 Highway 13 in Burnsville, in St. Cloud, and Ramsey County was in the process of <br />70 installing them on several local problematic roadways, including Lexington <br />71 Avenue from County Road E to Larpenteur Avenue; Larpenteur Avenue from <br />72 Highway 280 to Lexington Avenue; County Road D from I-35 to Highcrest <br />73 Avenue; and on the west side of Highway 96. Mr. Culver noted that the lights <br />74 were very bright in order to be seen during daylight hours. <br />75 <br />76 Member Wozniak noted another problem area south of County Road B-2 on a <br />77 weekday morning; with Mr. Culver responding that Ramsey County was aware of <br />78 the problem areas and frequent traffic light running. <br />Page 2 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.