Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rosevilie PT"ope.ties. Case No. 2G46 <br /> <br />Page ') <br /> <br />Llghtinq <br /> <br />No ir:formation hi;j$ bee:1 p:ovic-.::j for rev~e'....'. <br /> <br />Sigqjn.:; <br /> <br /> <br />As; noteG under :'h~ <br />couid have two py;on <br />area. The dcveioper <br />square feet of area. <br />requires a variance. <br /> <br />Background secttrJo abov 1 the S:Jbject Propert~' <br />sign~, each with a tata of 100 square ie~t of <br />is n~Cj...Jesting a singie py on with a teta! of 20D <br />Ihzs requested ~ign area exceeds th::, s:'2nda.d and <br /> <br />Taken at face value, this request 3eems quite :eas,)oab!e. ~he p..opert~ <br />owner is aliowed 200 square feet of sign area divided if'\tc. two ~;gns <br />and is simply asking tor al~ of this signage on a sing!€' pylor.. jr, our <br />opir.io>l, this is reaHy a pC'!icy question. Do yr::.J think that parcels that <br />are allm...:e::! two pyions should be able to conso]jjate their albwed <br />signage onto a single pylon? If the owner agrees to give Up one of <br />his/her sign locations, ~ho,;!d he/she be aiJD'wed to dOl.bie t~1e al!owed <br />signage on the sing!e pylon? Should the a!JcI..ed signage be 'TIore than <br />what ,",ould normally be allowed ::)1) Q single py;cn, but something less <br />than twice this arnount7 <br /> <br />Agaiil, Wf' be!;eve thi" is rea!!y more a policy I.juestion than a hardship <br />iS3ue, From the applicants' perspectives, they obviously recognize that <br />the vast rna jority of their business w):; come to them via CQunty Road <br />B-2, therefore, they want to maximize their signage there. On the <br />other h.md, there was aiso some rationale behind the limits placed cn <br />the aIJowed sign are;:; in th€ first pJ..ce. Other businesses aiong this <br />stretch of ,'uad w:thout corner lots wOlJid be iirnit,:d to half this much <br />sign area. This is a judgment cail on a policy quest.ion. <br /> <br />Screenir.q <br /> <br />The.e ar~ loadiog/sen'ke QiJors along the west side of the building. <br />AJthoug~ the cxterior cf the building ""i Ii be painted, the plan;; are not <br />to screen this area. <br /> <br />There is an area at the southwest en..:1 (1f the building hcade where <br />c):lpnsive uti!itt~S, p:~)e-s~ :;nd m2ters =1re ~lu5t~i'ed.. \-Vh~n I.....'c :o$i mc:t <br />with the applir:ants, ther had concluded t r.,,: t~t') CQuhj nr,t ex! end t.11" <br />same roof detail across this area.. T'Icy ~~"e 58:<j th.Jt they \.\1~U be <br />prep;-jrer1 to ~re5eqt 0 ::tv~v~ic;... ~::- ~~"\~ --~P.;'hf't ~c ti{?at;nertt of trJIS 2.rea <br />at the rneetj;lq. <br /> <br />T ra$~ f ~an0.i.i:,.9. <br /> <br />There is a tr~sh E:i1C!OSlJ. '_~ ir' <br />infGi":~ation h3S bcer~ subo:"!lUc_~ <br />w: U be hn; :dIed.. \Ve dn r.. t <br /> <br />th~ n:J!"tJ:west ,"':orner (~f the hli.:.. No <br />to ilh.islr-titl' hG\\' thJS J;n~~n!t()nt detad <br />~:lG\..., if it W!~, rnatch the bUjl0rT);.... <br /> <br />!nale;-;;)ls, h;n;) a dc-.en", Of 3. roc f ~ €'~_c. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />