Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2058 <br /> <br /> <br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DA TE: <br />CASE NuMBER: <br /> <br />:: Apri! 1990 <br /> <br />APPLICANT: <br /> <br />Dayton-! ~n Corporation <br /> <br />LOCA TlON: <br /> <br />Northeast COf!1er Qf Yighway <br />Jt: and Fairvie.. Avenur {lee <br />sketch) <br /> <br />ACTION REQU(STEO: <br /> <br />Approyal of 'IMiance to <br />Parking Setback <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDERA TlONS: <br /> <br />1. ~ACKGROl..N) <br />~ <br /> <br />Rosedakt Regional !:er.ter is a highJy successful shopping ~lex <br />originaUy deYeloped at about 600,000 squere feet in 196' and ultimately <br />incre88ed (through the addition 01 Penney"1i and Wards) to a center <br />alighUy OVM one minion aquare feet. Last fear (20 years UIter) the <br />C!ty apprrwed the current owners' (Equitable Life Insurance ~), <br />through its agents the Cent2r Compenies (now owned by ("'11 __ <br />Growth), proposal for liin expansion program with a new DaJlon's St.-e <br />and a conversion of the ekisting Dayton's Store into ~enant ap.aeeu. <br /> <br />A. the detaiif'd engineeriog :itoches w:re compaeted relating to the <br />adding of an additional Lane far northbound traffic ~ng R II. EI1 11 k <br />(off the Trunk Highway " ramp) were completed. it bee... obwioue <br />thBt ..dditionaJ rights-of-way would ~ necasary to p:~ 2)" engioe8I' ... <br />~l this portion of the Fairwiew Avenue roadway. I:.. is thentfere <br />proposed. in agreement with the City, County, .-.1 the 8happing ($I,,*, <br />owners and n-.ane'1ers, that. an additional 8 fee~ of l'ight--ol-.ay be <br />dedicated along t~.e east side of rain'iew Ave!Ne from the genet" sree <br />at the northea'.1 cotrer of the Trunk Highway 36 tamp and Fainiew. <br />ncr-therly to a point approximating' the current center of the ptapoeed <br />new 8~ to Roseale off fain-ie.. Avenue {somewhat north of U".e <br />e1tisting 8Ccesa)~ <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />The apj)iicants nave $Ubmiued a reduced drawing of tt-e right-of-way <br />cO()t'\qur'ation (the 11 .. 17 attachmentj, plus a f\;irrative, a leUer dated <br />March 2it and three copies of drawings dehneat.ing tI~ proposed <br />landscape treatment of the r~,....rt :",I~n~~~ ~t:-~~ ;,;~... ~~~ uf U~ae <br />are attached for your consideration. <br /> <br />The var-iance in this case is neceAar~ lc!cause the distance from the <br />new right.of-way Ii~ to the p8r:':ing ar-e;t, for~U: at n feet 'as <br />requiN!d), wiU be reduced t(, aj)proxiO\atei)f 7 feet. The parking curb <br />could be setback an e.:k!itioool 8 feet, thereby confcrming to \h-. <br />ori'}inel IS-foot requirement. However. tt)at would reduce t.he row of <br />head-in parking along the righl-of-way where the rOfld is to bt widttned. <br />The applicants. propose to dedicate the 8-f~t rlght.-of-.e)', but are <br />