Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Culver noted that a complication with that rationale was that a pedestrian <br /> ramp would need to be installed and the sidewalk therefore moved out to make <br /> the pedestrian ramp work; and include all pedestrian amenities. <br /> Chair Stenlund arrived at this time, approximately 6:50 p.m. <br /> 5. 2015 Utility Rate Proposal <br /> Mr. Schwartz welcomed Finance Director Chris Miller to provide staff's annual <br /> utility rate analysis and proposed 2015 rates for PWETC review and information; <br /> and as detailed in the staff report dated October 16, 2014 (Attachment A). <br /> Mr. Miller noted that the annual analysis considered current water sewer rates for <br /> any potential adjustments for the projected 2015 budget year, including long-term <br /> capital improvement program (CIP) needs for long-term operations. <br /> Mr. Miller reviewed the recommendations in detail and near-term financial needs <br /> to support operating and CIP budget needs. For the most part, Mr. Miller advised <br /> that the majority of single-family homeowners would see a reduction in their 2015 <br /> utility bills (as indicated in the chart on page 1 of Attachment A). With few <br /> exceptions, Mr. Miller advised that general day-to-day operations and CIP needs <br /> were fairly in check. <br /> Mr. Miller noted that the decrease in rates was primarily due to the elimination by <br /> the City Council of the current senior discount rate, moving to a financial needs <br /> based discount program for the benefit of all residents, no matter their age. Mr. <br /> Miller noted that this was based on a financial threshold eligibility requirement at <br /> 165% of the federal poverty threshold guidelines. Mr. Miller advised that this <br /> would result in approximately 25% of the current single-family households, <br /> currently receiving the senior discount rate, seeing their utility bills increase on <br /> average of$30 per quarter; while the remainder of the residents currently <br /> subsidizing that program no longing having to do so, eliminating the approximate <br /> $250,000 to $260,000 they currently pay annually to subsidize the senior discount <br /> program. Because of that change in policy, Mr. Miller advised that most homes <br /> in Roseville would now revert to paying full rate water and sewer rates, based on <br /> the 2015 proposed budget and twenty-year CIP needs. Mr. Miller noted that the <br /> City Council had been having ongoing discussions for a few years about the <br /> equity in continuing the senior discount rate program, and advised that he <br /> anticipated another discussion by the City Council at their November 17, 2014 <br /> meeting. While there may be additional changes and directives to staff following <br /> that discussion, Mr. Miller advised that the 2015 rates and assumptions were built <br /> into the proposed budget at this time. <br /> Mr. Miller referenced rate comparisons done annually with peer communities <br /> (chart on page 6 of Attachment A), with those comparisons among other first-ring <br /> suburbs and water systems, usage and populations roughly mirroring those of the <br /> City of Roseville, including the age of the infrastructure and community, which <br /> Page 4 of 17 <br />