Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Richard Kot.Jski, Ca~e No. 2062 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />onginally constructed ....a:; built 4 to 5 feet back further from the <br />origtllal right-of-way lines that were required. In man: case!;, where <br />additional right-of-"ay IS dedicated on a resid~!)tjal corper lot contiguous <br />to two major thoro!..ghfqres (as is the case here), the resultmg setback <br />is slgmficantly less thn the 24 or 25 feet. <br /> <br />You will nute that each of these lots is 10 feet less in lot width than <br />norm'3i1y requirc.... Thus, the division tends to balance the reduction <br />between the two lots propose. <br /> <br />~':.Igineering Considerations <br /> <br />Attached is a statement from the Engineering Department. You will <br />1'10te that the storm sewer assessment eqll3l1in~ $1,540.25 will be due <br />upon the filing of a new lot proposed. FuJI utl!ities are available to <br />serve the existir.g and proposed lat. <br /> <br />4. CONCLUSION <br /> <br />Though t"le proposed lots are theor<!tically sl.:bstandard, you will note <br />that there is a 75-foot lot contiguous to the property in questi.Jr' to <br />the ea~t. Tt-ere are also 75-foot iot:; in other areas in the VICInity. <br />The optio:ls here are either to lea..e it as a single, very large :ot or <br />to divide it into two lots. It w':JUld <,eem that the latter is ;"'ore <br />appropriate and will allow an adaitiona! single-family home lo be <br />constru:::led in RosevilJe. <br />