pf_02070 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

. . . .. . . , p . .. L . , .- '. .. ~ . '. - . " . . . ~ :- '~~ t' ( ( Brutger companies, Inc., Case ~o. 1864 Page ;: fro~ the r rth prcper~y l~nt. ~h€re as the previ~us propc5al ._ 5 35 feet. The second change is ':hat instead of the auildi~ being 2 and 3 stories high. the current structure ~s 3 stories in its er.t~rety. This as allowed them to make thd b~ildinq smaller, th~refore. increasinq the setbacks to the west ( f rt:'~ 50 feet to 112 feet). 5. Because additional land is being added. the nuaber of units bas been increased froO! 61 to 12. .l11e nnaber of parking spaces under the building has also been increaseci fro. 61 tc 82. A total of 14-4 parting: spaC&S is required: 146 are propcsed. A larger parking are~ u.'"lder the builciinq is provided because the m.c~ line;; units are relatively large. In a typical apart1aent develop:aent vita" 3 s~ories of residential units, the~e is ~dequate s~ ior 1 parking space per en it. . - 6. The propose~ st--uct~re js to ~ entirely of brick~ 4itb alusi!1ua sic!inq in areas .invc..:.vinq t.b~ balc~ies. 'tbou9h a pe..~ive dr~winq has been submitted, as of th.i..i da~e ,.-e d.o not Mve tU..ter1.0r elevations of the structure indicatinq the exact use of t_"ese Aterials and, aore importantly, the heiqht. of the building. 7. Durinq of discussions with the applicant rCCFrdinq tbis prcposal \Ie talked at:oct t:\E he'~ght of the b,,-ilding as. it relates to the previcu~ly a~prcve~ plan ~nd the residential bOlle sites to t.'1e north. !'be intent was tr.. keep tn6Se heiC)bts the same. Since ~he residentiAl l~ to the nort." is hiCJb, we feel it is illpOrtant that Ute reof on the new davelopaent be a pitched roof. Al thouqb this ..kes the roof higher, it provides a .ore attractive view than the top of a typic?l flat roof. e. WE understand ~hat the appli~ants ~~v~ had a ~etin9 with the neighbors as required and that ~here were posit1.va re~ult~. Cer~ainly an iRportant element is the height of ......_ _..........._.........._ ......._ ,.._.,~..._..... .___ ..""'..... """'-........a...._..:....' ,_.._ .._ ......c;.. .......... ........~_... w:. "'.."-' w~~......'-.... ....._ __ _..... .. '-~.._....... ... ......_ _....._..... _... the n~~th. ~nd the use of the ex~erior ~a:erials. 9. Subject to the re~ipt of additional ~nfor3~ticn, it vould appear that the propos~d dQvelop~nt constitu~es an .improvement over the previously appro~ed plan. Der.sity, rar~in9. and ~th~r code require~ents are ccn:ot~d to. The Fire ~~~shall no~e~ tha~ the L~ildinq will have to be supp'iied -at.h a sprinkler Si!;tt'.JR since there is roc vehicular ~~ce~s to all sid~s of the buildinq. The engineers n~te that there ar~ ~ome concerns relatinq to fcr~al dpp~cval ot the handling of the dcain~q~ a~ gr~dir.g 35 ~hey rel~te to t.he M~~T rlght.-of-way t~ the $outh. In p:cvious disc~ssions _ith the applican~. it -culd appear ~hat these rrc~lr.~s can be solved. ~ I 1 , ~, J