Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Jun~ 2S, 1990 <br /> <br /> <br />THE UNDERSISN~D T~J GROU?S OF :~EIG~BGRS HAVE A CJNCER~~D INTEREST IN <br /> <br />THE ZONING VARIAr~CE REQUEST FOR THE LAND lOCKED PIECE ~F PROPERTY <br /> <br />~0CATED BE~~ND 457 ~_ COUNTY ROAD 82. THiS VARIANCE IS BEING <br /> <br />REQUESTES FY MR. & MRS. JG:~N A~DERT. <br /> <br />Group i represents pe'-sGI1~ WhC'Sf prope!'ty is adj3cent to th~ property in question. <br /> <br />G.oup II repri'sents pe!""sor.s 1 i vi n9 ae ross streets "I' adjacent to S!-OUP 1 own~rs. <br /> <br />The fullowing persons in Group and Group II object to the ZOoing change request <br />for the fonowing rNsons: <br /> <br />1. Rosevil1e has an 85 foot minimum lot \lidth requii'ement. <br /> <br />2. The homes built in the last 25 }ears in this section of Western Hills <br />conform to this 35 foot wide rnihimum. <br />-- <br /> <br />3. The adjacent prOD~rty owner~ were told by Dan Con ar.d re~ltors the land <br />above them (let in questic,n) is land locked and hf.'lile cow,truetioTl win <br />~0t ~Q~C ~~~c~ ~~:~uS2 the pr~p2rty is ~a~d locked. <br /> <br />4. The value of at least five (S} home~ ~i11 significantly deprec~ate because <br />their p~ivace will be lost. <br /> <br />5. The construction of a hOUSE:: on that lot will alter tot') drainage and c()uld <br />eas~ly create s!:'riC~iS dl'ainage flow problems for five or six homes. <br /> <br />6. If the val'iance is. not a: lowed there \~ill be no Ecanor;;ic lo~s for the <br />Andert family in that they are r,:ere1y proposing t,) pm-chase the PI'C'pel'ty. <br /> <br />7.. Th~ 1 et is a haven for bi rds and Si11a n wi! 01 i fe and represents one uf a <br />~'et'Y fe;.; gr'een SpdCE:S left in Rose,..~lle. <br /> <br />PLEASE ROSEVILLE F-"LAliNING CQt.\HISSiON ,i!,ND !]S:::'VILLE CITY COIi;,CIL DON'T ALLGW YET <br /> <br />ANOTHER S~'..r-.LL Oi\SlS iO BE TORH APART A:m VlOLYft: ;',N 85 FeOT REQUI!\tHENT For THIS <br /> <br />ARU, HEREL Y :0 AJQ Grit :.10RE H0JSE. 1" ROSEV I LL~. <br />