Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />~,.~ JU, ~ 'Q3 {Q:n1t'H rc- cc-, I ,-,.." TT""t~ <br />"JII[V_, o."J~"i:;S: ~u~~..." :J";1.--' _.} -O-L.....\..,..'_ 1...~'~!?S'H)e'.e:". '~J 15.:5. <br /> <br />s1)." <br /> <br />I'1Id:.:}'8 <br /> <br />EX'l'RAcor OF Kn'UTES OF MEE'l'IflG or THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL c: THE CI~V OF RQSLVIT~~ <br /> <br />~~.."'Y'lit to due call iL~ notice thereof, a regular aeetinq o~ th~ <br />city COunciJ, of the City of RO$eville, County o~ i<nsey, <br />Kinnesota was ~y held on the _ !icy of , 1'9). at <br />'7=30 p... <br /> <br />'!'be follou1nq IIUlbers Wi:re prese:nt: <br /> <br />end the following were absent.: <br /> <br />~~ <br />and ~ved its a@ption. <br /> <br />RESOtD'nON N(\. <br /> <br />introdUced the follovinq r(>solution <br /> <br />A cmuu:CTIVE RESOLU'J'WR :R]t~G VACAnON OF A <br />PORTION OF T:-iE WI5T SNELLING Av"ENUE FRONT.AGE ROAD <br /> <br />WB:mmAo... after two weeks p~lieed and po$t.ed !IOtice, the C1ty <br />Council held.. public hoaring on lUy 26. a92, to deteraine <br />\1hethu or not said sn-eet in the City of Roseville ilbould be <br />vacat~: and <br /> <br />1IJIEREAS, it appeared that, b"i reason the fronta.ge road vas not <br />n6edad it would be btmaUcia} to the public intere~t to t'eOOaJIQM <br />vacating the strM~: and <br /> <br />WHEREAS. the city Cocmcil cUd, on Kay 26. 1992, pursuant to <br />lteaol\ltion !to. 580'2, vacate said frontaqe road: and <br /> <br />WHEREAS~ it ws subsequently I.amad tbilt there "''"as an error i., <br />tha leeJal d'iSCription of tM l1qbt-nil transit f'''...nt rataaecJ <br />by thQ Ci~y in ~i~ Re~olution No. 1802: 6nd <br /> <br />tf"BF.REAS, L~. City Council now h.nby duir-e1: tc; ~rract said <br />erraneo~ laq~l Qe4criplion ~i d~w~tiT~ ~ ~~=~~~~i~~ ~gcl~ti~~ <br />vlU. the ~ete and coxrGct loq&l ti...criJ>t1c>n for sa.id <br />vac;.t1o~. including ~e correct 1egal description of the retained. <br />light-~il ~rar.~it. A8sementi <br /> <br />~ICKS <br />