My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03232
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03232
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:50:39 PM
Creation date
12/14/2004 6:27:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3232
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Project Name
TWIN LAKES
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1764
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.~ <br /> <br />1 b. Plannin!! File 3232: A request by the City of Roseville to amend the <br />2 Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of the Twin Lakes Redevelopment <br />3 Area from its current designation of Business (B) and Industrial (I) to Business <br />4 Park (BP), a new land use designation. The Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area is <br />5 generally located east of Cleveland Avenue, west of Lincoln Drive, south of <br />6 County Road C2 and Brenner A venue, and north of County Road C. A map of <br />7 the specific parcels can be obtained from the Roseville Community Development <br />8 Department. <br />9 <br />10 Chairman Craig Klausing opened the public hearing and requested Community <br />11 Development Director Dennis Welsch to provide a verbal summary of the staff <br />12 report dated November 8, 2000. <br />13 <br />14 Karen Milton, 2939 Mildred, noted some choices may affect lake and life quality. <br />15 Leave forest area on west side oflake. Housing should be town homes (not high <br />16 density on Lake). There is traffic concerns (5000-7000 vehicles) that should be <br />17 studied. She opposes retail uses in area because of existing retail - no big box <br />18 retail. Preserve quality oflife. <br />19 <br />20 Member Mulder asked if she preferred existing hi-tech/flex west of the lake, <br />21 similar to Centre Pointe (Yes). <br />22 <br />23 Member Wilke asked about the traffic demand in the area. (To be studied in <br />24 AUAR) <br />25 <br />26 Member Mulder asked about vehicles and air quality. (To be studied in AUAR) <br />27 <br />28 Chair Klausing asked how deregulation and redevelopment will affect trucking in <br />29 the future. <br />30 <br />31 Steve Miller, Old Dominian Freight, said trucking does want to remain. <br />32 Deregulation had little to do with trucking in the area - it was the economics in <br />33 the industry. The 1980 deregulation added trucking - there is a need for more <br />34 terminals. New property for terminals is too far out from center city to improve <br />35 or maintain "stem-time". Forced relocation would greatly increase the cost of <br />36 trucking. The current terminal was built in 1963. The value of the land tends to <br />37 make moving attractive. Bringing in 8000 new vehicles (from new employees) <br />38 will be a big impact compared to existing trucking. <br />39 <br />40 Pat Johnson, 2986 Mildred Drive, described Langton Lake park and shore land <br />41 zoning. Warehouses were built in 1974, the developers along the west and south <br />42 sides provided a dedication of 100 feet, to further protect the shoreland. <br />43 <br />44 She noted that the 1988 Plan was adopted because the truckers would sell at <br />45 higher prices, then relocate further north. As market develops, Roseville had a <br />46 plan in place to address future land uses. In 1988, the development plan was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.