My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03232
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3200
>
pf_03232
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:50:39 PM
Creation date
12/14/2004 6:27:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3232
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Project Name
TWIN LAKES
Applicant
CITY OF ROSEVILLE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1764
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. Big Box may spur redevelopment quicker but may also hinder the <br />area based upon which retailer and the designs. <br />. Most medical device companies require 24 foot clear ceilings. <br />. Service mix is well located along the freeway and C - especially for <br />hotel visibility; it makes a nice entrance to the park. Some <br />participants thought service could also be successful integrated into <br />Twin Lakes as shown in Option 3. One suggested that the High-tech <br />flex/office element in Option 2 and 4 immediately north Twin Lakes <br />Parkway along Cleveland be changed to service because of highway <br />visibility and convenient access to office/hightech flex immediately <br />east along the parkway. The most important component of the service <br />mix will be the design of the ingress and egress. <br />e Shared parking never works. It will make getting developers and <br />tenants difficult; no one likes it. <br />i> Should evaluate fiber optic capabilities for the area. <br /> <br />Pathways/Sidewalks <br />. Not opposed to public pathways within developments but there are <br />always the questions on who is going to maintain or own this space. <br /> <br />Policy <br />@ Plan for flexibility in use in order to meet changing market. Can not <br />predict what will happen in 20 years. Review every 2-4 years. <br />@) Develop policies on redevelopment that can be consistent for a long <br />time. Don't do for one that you would not do for another. <br />(j Need some flexibility in use (e.g. office AND high tech flex) to get <br />development during the life of the current TIP district. <br />@ Construction of Twin Lakes Parkway and a strong commitment to the <br />redevelopment is key to show the development community and <br />potential tenants the vision and reality of the redevelopment. <br />@ Need to streamline the development rapidly to maximize the benefits <br />of TIF since the district expires in 2014. Therefore, may need to be <br />prepared to use condemnation. <br />@ Property is too expensive already -out of market prices - which <br />should be brought back to fair market value for the city public <br />purposes and interests as well as for the redevelopment using eminent <br />domain - condemnation <br />G> With brownfield clean-up you need a 1) clear timetable; 2) <br />commitment to use condemnation consistent with certain principles <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.