Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. Eliminate Mount Ridge easement north of County C2. <br /> <br />Traffic: <br />. Too much new traffic will be created and not enough traffic problems <br />will be solved with any option. <br />. Retail will create the worst traffic impacts. <br /> <br />Policy: <br />. Be careful with designs - need architectural designs but it should not <br />look like a military complex. <br />. The majority of the commercial and industrial development is west of <br />Snelling. Why more? What percentage of total CIK are in the Twin <br />Lakes area current! y? <br />. If the buildings are being used productively then why is there a need <br />to change? <br />. Why more office space, there are already offices vacant along 35W. <br />.. Hospitals - is this real? Residents would like a hospital near by so they <br />wouldn't have to travel so far to a hospital <br />. Why hotels? There are enough already. <br /> <br />November 2, 2000 10:00 am <br />Property Owners Comments <br /> <br />General: <br />II Suggestion that the property owners get together and decide <br />collectively what to do with their land rather than the City deciding <br />for them. <br />e Should remain flexible due to the changing market conditions. <br /> <br />Land Use: <br />($ Alternative 4, with some retail, makes sense -especially since there <br />are no other retail growth areas in Roseville and there is a natural <br />buffer of the residential neighborhood to the south created by County <br />Road C. <br />Ii> Alternative 3 puts "too many eggs in the office basket" <br />e Alternative 4 could have higher density housing - a nice apartment <br />complex west of Langton Lake with views of the lake <br />o Put plan back to the 1988 land use which included retail. <br /> <br />6 <br />