pf_03350 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

that included six other cities. For 2001, the Build-Out Study illustrates housing units, jobs and per capita growth for the seven city Coalition through 2020. The Roseville City Council also approved amendments to the City Code, Zoning Section 1004 (Accessory Buildings) on February 12,2001. An amendment to Section 1008.10Dlf and 1015.01A of the Zoning code pertaining to majority vote has also been approved and incorporated into the 2001 affirmation. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is required by State Statute 462.356 to be part of the Comprehensive Plan review process in this sense: Annually, the Planning Commission is to review the list of implementation projects (for 2002) and advise/affirm whether they are consistent with land use provisions and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Commission is also to review the remainder of the five-year CIP as a "guide" and advise on consistency with the Plan or recommend changes in the Plan to create more consistency. The Commission is not charged with the task of reviewing and advising on financial feasibility or budgetary issues. 2.12 Section 12 - Appendices: Comprehensive Plan Appendices, Book 2 continues to be updated to retain implementation programs and other works and "white papers" for each Section. It also contains a summary of the five-year capital improvement program consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 3.1 The Community Development Department recommends affirming these changes and officially including them in the 2001 - 2002 Plan. 4.0 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION PROCEDURE 4.1 On January 2, 2002, the Planning Commission will re-open the required public hearing. After accepting and discussing public comment, the Commission closes the hearing. By a resolution the Planning Commission reaffirms the changes (additions and deletions) made to the Plan during 2001, adopts the outline for placement in the Plan and recommends that the changes be placed within the Comprehensive Plan, and advises that the CIP is (is not) consistent with the Plan. The Plan is then sent to the Council for its action. 4.2 Assuming that the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission, copies of the Plan are distributed via the Internet and compact disk. Copies are also sent to the Metropolitan Council to update the City's file, and notice of availability of the Comprehensive Plan is distributed to surrounding cities. 5.0 SUGGESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 5.1 Open the public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan and 2002 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) affirmation, request public comments on both and on the inclusion of the updates/changes recommended by staff regarding the Comprehensive Plan. PF 3350 - RPCA (01/02/02) - Page 4 of 5