Laserfiche WebLink
<br />h. A pre-existing nonconforming residential stmcture used solely for a residential <br />purpose may be enlarged provided the number of dwelling units is not increased <br />and the expansion does not encroach closer to the property line than the setbacks <br />of the City Code. The lot coverage area of the impervious surfaces on the lot may <br />not be increased to more than thirty percent (30%) or twenty-five percent (25%) in <br />lakeshore districts, and compliance with all other development standards of the <br />Zoning Code must be followed. <br /> <br />If any pre-existing nonconfOlming stmcture is damaged by fire, flood, explosion or other casualty <br />than no more than 50% of its production cost, may be reconstmcted and used as before if such <br />reconstmction is completed within six (6) months of the casualty. However, every effort shall be <br />made to make the stmcture comply with the City Code requirements. <br /> <br />For damage which is more than 50% of production cost, major reconstmction must be in <br />accordance with the requirements of the Zoning District. "Production cost" is determined by the <br />City Council. This major reconstmction must be undertaken within six months of such casualty <br />and completed within one year. In addition, a major restoration of the stmcture cannot have <br />greater encroachment, lot coverage or square footage than before such casualty. <br /> <br />Definitions: "Substantially More Detrimental" for pre-existing, nonconforming uses <br /> <br />Expansions and changes of use of pre-existing nonconforming stmctures that do not comply with <br />current zoning or district can alter the character and property values of an established <br />development or neighborhood as well as future redevelopments in the area. Under state law, the <br />City Council, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, has little guidance to determine <br />when a proposed expansion, reconstmction, or change of use is substantially more detrimental to <br />the surrounding area (present and future planned). <br /> <br />The City project review criteria for consideration in these "expansion or change" cases, includes <br />criteria regarding lot coverage; building mass; hours of usage; reduction in traffic, noise, light, <br />and hazardous materials storage, life safety improvements, and other issues of concern. One <br />effect of this type of regulation is that, while there is an "expansion or change", overall the new <br />use(s) or stmcture(s) will come closer to being a conforming use in the zoning district. <br /> <br />Nonconforming Parcels or Subdivisions <br /> <br />If any lot of record does not meet the minimum lot size and frontage requirements as established <br />within the Roseville City Code and that lot existed at the effective date of adoption of the Code <br />(I 959), and the lot meets at least seventy percent (70%) of each dimensional requirement of the <br />current Code, the owner may develop that lot in conformance with the current setback and lot <br />coverage standards. The lot must be developed in conformance with all other requirements of the <br />Code. If the lot cannot be developed under the existing standards or if the previous standards <br />cannot be determined, a variance will be required from the City Council (Board of Zoning <br />Appeals). <br /> <br />PF3359 - RPCA(080702) Page 7 of 8 <br />